S53C
Earthquake Source Studies: Finite-Fault Inversion, Modeling, and Data Assimilation II

Friday, 18 December 2015: 13:40-15:40
305 (Moscone South)
Primary Conveners:  Paul Martin Mai, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
Conveners:  Lifeng Wang, CENC China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing, China, Jan Dettmer, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada and Chen Ji, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
Chairs:  Paul Martin Mai, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia and Lifeng Wang, CENC China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing, China
OSPA Liaisons:  Lifeng Wang, CENC China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing, China
13:40
S53C-01
A new strategy to compare inverted rupture models exploiting the eigen-structure of the inverse problem (Invited) (63140)
Frantisek Gallovic, Charles University, Faculty of Math. and Phys., Dept. of Geophysics, Prague, Czech Republic and Jean-Paul Ampuero, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
13:55
S53C-02
Probabilistic modeling of earthquakes (Invited) (60991)
Zacharie Duputel1, Romain Jolivet2, Junle Jiang3, Mark Simons3, Luis A Rivera1, Jean-Paul Ampuero3, Baptiste Gombert1 and Sarah E. Minson4, (1)Institut de Physique du Globe de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, (2)Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris, Department of Geosciences, Paris, France, (3)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Menlo Park, CA, United States
14:10
S53C-03
Considering the inaccurate Green’s functions and the errors of source models during finite fault source inversion (81693)
Chen Ji, Jorge G. F. Crempien and Ralph J Archuleta, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
14:25
S53C-04
Determining the Uncertainty Range of Coseismic Stress Drop of Large Earthquakes Using Finite Fault Inversion (75878)
Mareike Adams, Chen Ji, Cedric Twardzik and Ralph J Archuleta, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
14:40
S53C-05
Rapid kinematic finite-fault inversion for an Mw 7+ scenario earthquake in the Marmara Sea: An uncertainty study (76294)
Faqi Diao1,2, Rongjiang Wang2, Hideo Aochi3, Thomas R Walter2, Yong Zhang4, Yong Zheng5 and Xiong Xiong5, (1)Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China, (2)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (3)BRGM, Orleans, France, (4)Peking University, Beijing, China, (5)Institute of Geodesy & Geophysics, Hubei, China
14:55
S53C-06
Can earthquake source inversion benefit from rotational ground motion observations? (78464)
Heiner Igel1, Stefanie Donner2, Michael Reinwald3, Moritz Bernauer3, Joachim M Wassermann3 and Andreas Fichtner4, (1)Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany, (2)University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany, (3)Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany, (4)ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
15:10
S53C-07
Joint Inversion of 1-Hz GPS Data and Strong Motion Records for the Rupture Process of the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake: Objectively Determining Relative Weighting (76928)
Zhen Wang1, Teruyuki Kato1 and Yuebing Wang2, (1)Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, (2)CEA China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China
15:25
S53C-08
The 1995 Mw 7.2 Gulf of Aqaba Earthquake revisited: Identifying active fault segments by joint inversion of geodetic and teleseismic data (79394)
Hannes Bathke1, Guangcai Feng2, Sebastian Heimann3, Sigurjon Jonsson1 and Paul Martin Mai1, (1)King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia, (2)Central South University, Changsha, China, (3)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
 
See more of: Seismology
<< Previous Session | Next Session >>