GRAIL Investigation of the Subsurface Structure of South Pole-Aitken Basin

Adrienne Ertel1, Francis Nimmo2, Jonathan Besserer1 and Debra Hurwitz Needham3, (1)University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States, (2)University of California, Santa Cruz, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Santa Cruz, United States, (3)Lunar & Planetary Institute, Houston, TX, United States
Abstract:
The GRAIL mission [1] has revealed a lunar crust that is globally less dense and presumably more porous [2] than anticipated. Measurements of the inferred (effective) density as a function of wavelength provide a way of probing the vertical density structure of the crust. Both the mean vertical density stratification [3] and spatial variations in the density structure [4] have been determined. Here we used an admittance approach [4] to investigate the subsurface structure of South Pole-Aikten (SPA) Basin.

The SPA-forming impact was large enough to generate enormous quantities of melt [5,6] and a global ejecta layer [7]. The pre-existing crust was probably completely removed [8]; GRAIL data indicate a depth to the base of the crust (or other density interface) at a depth of about 13-20 km beneath the basin center [2]. Cooling and crystallization of the melt pool will have generated a distinct stratigraphy and density structure [6,5]. This predicted density structure can then be compared to that inferred from the GRAIL observations.

We determined the effective density spectrum of SPA using a localized multitaper approach [4]. The effective density decreases from 2.7 g/cc at spherical harmonic degree l=250 to 2.6 g/cc at l=550, indicating an increase in density with depth. Two model predictions from [5] yield effective densities in the range 3.0-3.2 g/cc. The discrepancy between the predictions and the observations could be explained by 1) incorporations of large volumes of crustal material into the recrystallizing melt-sheet; or 2) ~20% fracture porosity extending to depths of 10 km or more. The latter possibility is more likely given SPA early formation and subsequent reprocessing and delivery of low-density material by impacts.

[1] Zuber et al. 2013 [2] Wieczorek et al. 2013 [3] Han et al. 2013 [4] Besserer et al. 2014 [5] Hurwitz and Kring 2014 [6] Vaughan and Head 2013 [7] Petro and Pieters 2004 [8] Potter et al. 2012