Creep and Hysteresis Effects on the Marcellus Shale Matrix Permeability Behavior

Athma R. Bhandari, University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, TX, United States, Peter J Polito, The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, TX, United States, Peter B Flemings, The University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Geophysics and Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, United States and Steven L Bryant, Univ of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
Abstract:
Pulse-decay permeability measurements on a Marcellus shale sample at a constant differential pressure of 12.4 MPa [1800 psi] demonstrate minor hysteresis in permeability behavior. Permeability measured at the same confining and pore pressure conditions over 90 days do not decline significantly suggesting that creep also plays a minor role. The sample has ~3% porosity. Permeability measurements were made in two repeated cycles. In each cycle, the sample is first held at a high confining and pore pressure—27.6 MPa [4000 psi] and 15.2 MPa [2200 psi], respectively—where we complete multiple permeability tests to analyze creep behavior. We then incrementally decrease confining and pore pressure to 13.8 MPa [2000 psi] and 1.4 MPa [200 psi], respectively, while completing three to five permeability tests prior to reaching the final pressure. During the first creep stage, the permeability decreases from 4.7×10-21 m2 [4.7 nd] to 4.2×10-21 m2 [4.2 nd] over a two week period while during the second creep stage permeability remains constant at ~3.4×10-21 m2 [3.4 nd]. We observe hysteresis in permeability values between the two cycles. The permeability decreases from 13.2×10-21 m2 [13.2 nd] to 8.7×10-21 m2 [8.7 nd] during the first cycle at the lowest confining and pore pressure condition, but decreases only marginally to 7.7×10-21 m2 [7.7 nd] at the end of the second cycle. A better understanding of how permeability changes as stress evolves may illuminate production behavior of these gas shales.