Atmospheric, Non-Tidal Oceanic and Hydrological Loading Effects Observed with GPS Measurements
Abstract:
- The inverted barometer (IB) hypothesis is usually chosen, but this approximation is valid for periods exceeding typically a week.
- However at higher frequencies, the dynamics of the ocean response cannot be neglected. We use a global barotropic ocean model forced by air pressure and winds, namely the Toulouse Unstructured Grid Ocean model (TUGO-m).
The latest (ECMWF+TUGO-m) computation is incompatible with non-tidal ocean loading estimates with bottom pressure computed with classical baroclinic ocean GCMs (such as ECCO) forced by atmospheric winds, heat and fresh-water fluxes.
We combine the atmospheric loading with the induced oceanic loading estimated from the two models filtering out short and long periods of the ECMWF+IB and EMCWF+TUGO-m loading time series, respectively, and summing the resulting time series; then non-tidal oceanic loading effects can be included in the modeling.
As hydrological loading effects also cause a large part of the seasonal displacements, we add to our loading estimates the modeled displacements using different global hydrology models.
We compare our loading models to a global set of reprocessed GPS observations, and investigate how they can be reduced with the different hypotheses, for example IB vs TUGO-m, looking at different frequency bands (from seasonal to a few days).
