S53A:
Bayesian Methods in Solid Earth Geophysics: Sources to Structure II Posters

Session ID#: 3089

Friday, 19 December 2014: 1:40 PM-6:00 PM
Poster Hall (Moscone_South)
Chairs:  Sarah E. Minson1, Zacharie Duputel2, Romain Jolivet1 and Thomas Bodin3, (1)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States(2)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States(3)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
Primary Convener:  Zacharie Duputel, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Co-conveners:  Romain Jolivet, Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States, Sarah E. Minson, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States and Thomas Bodin, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Sarah E. Minson, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
Co-Sponsor(s):
  • G - Geodesy
  • T - Tectonophysics
Index Terms:

1209 Tectonic deformation [GEODESY AND GRAVITY]
3260 Inverse theory [MATHEMATICAL GEOPHYSICS]
7215 Earthquake source observations [SEISMOLOGY]
7270 Tomography [SEISMOLOGY]
Virtual Option?: No
Swirl Theme: Characterizing Uncertainty

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

 
Landslide caracteristics determination using bayesian inversion and seismic recording (12546)
Laurent Moretti1, Anne Mangeney2, Yann Capdeville3, Eleonore Stutzmann1, Thomas Bodin4 and Francois Bouchut5, (1)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, (2)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France, (3)CNRS, Paris Cedex 16, France, (4)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States, (5)Université Marne la Vallée, Laboratoire d’Analyse et de Mathématiques Appliquées, Marne la Vallée, France
 
Applying a Hidden Markov Model-Based Event Detection and Classification Algorithm to Apollo Lunar Seismic Data (8441)
Brigitte Knapmeyer-Endrun, MPI for Solar System Research, Goettingen, Germany and Conny Hammer, University Potsdam, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Potsdam, Germany
 
Reducing Nonuniqueness in Finite Source Inversion Using Rotational Ground Motions (3946)
Moritz Bernauer, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Andreas Fichtner, ETH Zurich, Institute of Geophysics, Zurich, Switzerland and Heiner Igel, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
 
Inversion for slip distribution for the 2012 Costa Rica earthquake (31557)
Kimberly A McCormack, University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, TX, United States, Marc A Hesse, The University of Texas at Austin, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, United States and Georg Stadler, UT Austin, Austin, TX, United States
 
A Note on the Regularization of Linear Inversion for Estimating Quasi-Static Fault Slip Distributions (32078)
Alberto Ardid Segura, University of Chile, Department of Geophysics, Santiago, Chile, Francisco H Ortega Culaciati, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile and Prof. Mark Simons, Ph.D., California Institute of Technology, Seismological Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
Kinematic source inversions of teleseismic data based on the QUESO library for uncertainty quantification and prediction (12082)
Olaf Zielke1, Damon McDougall2, Paul Martin Mai1 and Ivo Babuska2, (1)KAUST, Thuwal, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, (2)University of Texas at Austin, ICES, Austin, TX, United States
 
The Study of Fault Valve Behaviour by Using Microearthquake Source Parameters (21423)
Strong Wen1, Wei-Jhe Wu2, Yi-Zen Chang1, Chauhuei Chen3 and Yu-Lien Yeh2, (1)NCREE National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering of Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, (2)Graduate Institute of Seismology National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi County, Taiwan, (3)National Chung Cheng University, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chiayi County, Taiwan
 
A Trial for Improvement in Reproducibility of Spatial Distribution of Afterslip in Geodetic Data Inversion (27972)
Takane Hori1, Ryoko Nakata1, Tatsu Kuwatani2 and Masato Okada3, (1)Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan, (2)Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, (3)Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan
 
Can uncertainty of earthquake focal mechanisms impact the significance of results on tidal triggering? (21527)
Magda Bucholc1, Sandy Steacy2 and Nuno Simão2, (1)University of Ulster, Londonderry, BT48, United Kingdom, (2)University of Ulster, Coleraine, United Kingdom
 
Uncertainty analysis of the 2009 L'Aquila rupture model using one- and three-dimensional crustal structure (14855)
Hoby Njara T. Razafindrakoto, Walter Imperatori and Paul Martin Mai, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
 
Bayesian Estimation of 2005 Fukuoka (Japan) Earthquake Source Parameters and Associated Coulomb Failure Stress Changes from InSAR and GPS (21852)
Rishabh Dutta, Teng Wang and Sigurjon Jonsson, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
 
Estimation of completeness magnitude with a Bayesian modeling of daily and weekly variations in earthquake detectability (23022)
Takaki Iwata, Inst. Stat. Math (ISM), Tokyo, Japan; Tokiwa University, College of Community Development, Ibaraki, Japan
 
A Bayesian Method to Apply the Results of Multiple-Event Seismic Location to a Subsequent Event (18618)
Gardar Johannesson and Stephen C Myers, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United States
 
Rapid Bayesian point source inversion using pattern recognition --- bridging the gap between regional scaling relations and accurate physical modelling (12651)
Paul Kaeufl1, Ralph W.L. De Wit1, Andrew P Valentine2 and Jeannot Trampert3, (1)Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584, Netherlands, (2)Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia, (3)Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
 
Hierarchical Bayesian Inversion for the Centroid Moment Tensor (20262)
Marija Mustac, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia and Hrvoje Tkalčić, Australian National University, Research School of Earth Sciences, Canberra, ACT, Australia
 
A Hierarchical Bayesian Approcah for Earthquake Location and Data Uncertainty Estimation in 3D Heterogeneous Media (28583)
Pierre Arroucau1,2 and Susana Custodio1,2, (1)Centro de Geofisica, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, (2)Instituto Dom Luiz, Centro de Geofisica da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
 
Transdimensional Bayesian Joint Inversion of Complementary Seismic Observables with Realistic Data Uncertainties (17910)
Chao Gao, University of Maryland College Park, Dept. of Geology, College Park, MD, United States and Vedran Lekic, University of Maryland College Park, Department of Geology, College Park, MD, United States
 
Towards 2D Bayesian Tomography of Receiver Functions (18812)
Anandaroop Ray, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, United States; Chevron Corporation Houston, Geophysical R&D, Houston, TX, United States, Thomas Bodin, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States and Kerry Key, BlueGreen Geophysics, LLC, San Diego, United States
 
Transdimensional imaging of random velocity inhomogeneities in Nankai subduction zone (21572)
Tsutomu Takahashi1, Koichiro Obana1, Yojiro Yamamoto1, Yuka Kaiho1, Ayako Nakanishi1, Shuichi Kodaira2 and Yoshiyuki Kaneda1,3, (1)JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan, (2)Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan, (3)Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
 
A Multi-scale Framework for Trans-dimensional Tomography (8268)
Rhys Hawkins, Australian National University, Research School of Earth Sciences, Acton, Australia and Malcolm Sambridge, Australian National University, Research School of Earth Sciences, Canberra, Australia
 
Stochastic Monte-Carlo Markov Chain Inversions on Models Regionalized Using Receiver Functions (16358)
Carene S Larmat1, Monica Maceira2, Yasuyuki Kato3, Thomas Bodin4, Marco Calo5, Barbara A Romanowicz6, Chengping Chai2 and Prof. Charles J Ammon, PhD7, (1)Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States, (2)Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States, (3)RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS), Saitama, Japan, (4)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States, (5)Berkeley Seismological Lab, Berkeley, CA, United States, (6)University of California Berkeley, Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Berkeley, United States, (7)Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, Department of Geosciences, University Park, PA, United States
 
Robustness of Global Radial Anisotropy Models of the Upper Mantle (24845)
Zheng Xing1, Caroline Beghein2 and Kaiqing Yuan1, (1)University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (2)University of California Los Angeles, Earth, Space, and Planetary Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, United States
 
Bayesian Inversion of Broadband Surface Waves Dispersion Curves for Shear Velocity Structure and Anisotropy of the Crust and Upper Mantle (13226)
Matteo Ravenna and Sergei Lebedev, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Dublin, Ireland
 
A Bayesian approach to linear inverse problems in seismic tomography (20243)
Yuan Tian1, Ying Zhou1,2, Julianne Chung2, Matthias Chung3 and Jieyuan Ning1, (1)School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China, (2)Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States, (3)Virginia Tech, Mathematics, Blacksburg, United States
 
Spherical Harmonic Analysis via Bayesian Inference (19579)
Jack Broderick Muir and Hrvoje Tkalčić, Australian National University, Research School of Earth Sciences, Canberra, ACT, Australia
See more of: Seismology