C43A:
Modeling of the Cryosphere II Posters

Session ID#: 3495

Thursday, 18 December 2014: 1:40 PM-6:00 PM
Not an Option (Moscone West)
Chairs:  Michael T Durand, Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center, Columbus, United States and Tobias Jonas, SLF / WSL, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Primary Convener:  Noah P Molotch, University of Colorado at Boulder, Geography / INSTAAR, Boulder, United States; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Co-conveners:  Adam H Winstral, WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos Dorf, Switzerland, Michael T Durand, Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center, Columbus, United States and Tobias Jonas, SLF / WSL, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
OSPA Liaison:  Michael T Durand, Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center, Columbus, United States
Co-Sponsor(s):
  • A - Atmospheric Sciences
  • H - Hydrology
Index Terms:

0702 Permafrost [CRYOSPHERE]
0736 Snow [CRYOSPHERE]
0776 Glaciology [CRYOSPHERE]
0798 Modeling [CRYOSPHERE]
Virtual Option?: No

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

 
Ground Ice in the New Crrel Permafrost Tunnel (9730)
Mikhail Z Kanevskiy1, Yuri Shur2, James E Beget2, Nancy H Bigelow2, Kevin Bjella3, Margaret Cysewski Rudolf3, Torre Jorgenson4 and Matthew Sturm5, (1)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Institute of Northern Engineering, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (2)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (3)CRREL, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (4)Alaska Ecoscience, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (5)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States
 
Developing a numerical model of ice wedge degradation and trough formation (26019)
Viacheslav Garayshin, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States, Dmitry Nicolsky, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute Permafrost Laboratory, Fairbanks, AK, United States and Vladimir E Romanovsky, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States
 
Sensitivity of rock slope stability in relation to thermal regime – examples from Norway (12727)
Kristin Saeterdal Myhra1, Bernd Etzelmuller1 and Lars Harald Blikra2,3, (1)University of Oslo, Department of Geosciences, Oslo, Norway, (2)Aknes/Tafjord Beredskap IKS, Stranda, Norway, (3)Sogn og Fjordane University College, Sogndal, Norway
 
Evaluation of Gridded Snow Water Equivalent Products in British Columbia, Canada (31586)
Andrew M Snauffer1, William W Hsieh1 and Alex J Cannon2, (1)University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (2)University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
 
Assessment of Hydrologic Impacts of Snowdrift in a Snow Dominated Watershed (27799)
Mukesh Kumar1, Xing Chen1, Bijan Seyednasrollah2, Adam H Winstral3, Michele L Reba4 and Danny G Marks5, (1)Duke University, Nicholas School of the Environment, Durham, NC, United States, (2)Northern Arizona University, School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Flagstaff, AZ, United States, (3)WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos Dorf, Switzerland, (4)USDA, ARS, Delta Water Management Research Unit, Jonesboro, AR, United States, (5)USDA-ARS, Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise, ID, United States
 
Snowmelt sensitivity to warmer temperatures: a field-validated model analysis, southern Sierra Nevada, California (27695)
Keith N Musselman, University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Geography, Boulder, United States, Noah P Molotch, University of Colorado at Boulder, Geography / INSTAAR, Boulder, United States and Steven A Margulis, UCLA, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Los Angeles, United States
 
A Simple Framework for Quantifying Warming-based Snowpack Declines at the Landscape Scale (18022)
Christopher Tennant, Idaho State University, Geoghraphy, Pocatello, ID, United States, Benjamin T Crosby, Idaho State University, Geosciences, Pocatello, ID, United States, Sarah Godsey, Idaho State University, Geosciences, Idaho Falls, ID, United States, Robert Van Kirk, Humboldt State University, Mathematics, Arcata, CA, United States and DeWayne Derryberry, Idaho State University, Mathematics, Pocatello, ID, United States
 
Comparison of Microphysics Schemes for Simulation of Snow Cover Fraction in the Sierra Nevada (22155)
Melissa Wrzesien, Ohio State University Main Campus, Columbus, United States, Michael T Durand, Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center, Columbus, United States, Tamlin Pavelsky, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Earth, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Chapel Hill, NC, United States, Sarah B Kapnick, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States and Thomas H Painter, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
Validation of snow cover simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model using in-situ snow survey data in the Altai Mountains (20201)
Konosuke Sugiura1,2, Hideyuki Kitabata2 and Tsutomu Kadota2, (1)University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan, (2)JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan
 
Estimating Longwave Atmospheric Emissivity in the Canadian Rocky Mountains (17903)
Samaneh Ebrahimi and Shawn J Marshall, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
 
Quantifying the change in equilibrium-line altitude during the Last Glacial Maximum in the Subtropical Andes using a mass-balance model (26292)
Lauren Vargo, University of New Mexico Main Campus, Albuquerque, NM, United States and Joseph Galewsky, University of New Mexico, Earth & Planetary Sciences, Albuquerque, NM, United States
 
Modeling the surface mass balance and firn evolution of glaciers around Kongsfjorden, Svalbard (21317)
Ward Jan Jacobus van Pelt and Jack Kohler, Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway
 
Near-surface climate of the Antarctic Peninsula as simulated by a high-resolution regional atmospheric climate model (18509)
Melchior van Wessem1, Carleen Reijmer1 and Michiel R van den Broeke2, (1)Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, (2)Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
 
Changing Surface-Atmosphere Energy Exchange and Refreezing Capacity of the Lower Accumulation Area, West Greenland (17036)
Charalampos Charalampidis1,2, Dirk van As3, Horst Machguth4,5, Paul Smeets6, Michiel R van den Broeke7 and Jason E Box3, (1)Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Munich, Germany, (2)Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, (3)Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, København K, Denmark, (4)Technological University of Denmark, Arctic Technology Centre, Lyngby, Denmark, (5)Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen, Denmark, (6)Utrecht University, Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, (7)Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
 
Numerical model of meltwater retention and firn aquifer formation in Greenland Ice Sheet (16737)
Xiaojian Liu, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States and Jeremy N Bassis, University of Michigan, Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, Ann Arbor, United States
 
Basal Melt Under the Interior of the Greenland Ice Sheet: Comparison of Models, Deep Ice Cores, and Radar Observations (11713)
Soroush Rezvanbehbahani, University of Kansas, Department of Geology, Lawrence, KS, United States, Leigh A Stearns, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, United States and Cornelis Jakob Van der Veen, University of Kansas, Department of Geography, Lawrence, KS, United States; University of Kansas, Department of Geography and Atmospheric Science, Lawrence, United States
See more of: Cryosphere