G51A:
Cryosphere, Solid Earth, and Sea-Level Interactions and the Next Generation of Glacial Isostatic Models II Posters
Session ID#: 5026
Friday, 19 December 2014: 8:00 AM-12:20 PM
Not an Option (Moscone West)
Chairs: Volker Klemann, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany and Jeanne M Sauber, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Geodesy and Geophysics Laboratory, Greenbelt, United States
Primary Convener: Jeanne M Sauber, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Geodesy and Geophysics Laboratory, Greenbelt, United States
Co-conveners: Erik Roman Ivins, JPL/Caltech, Pasadena, United States, Wouter van der Wal, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft, Netherlands and Volker Klemann, GFZ German Research Centre, Dept. 1 Geodesy, Potsdam, Germany
OSPA Liaison: Erik Roman Ivins, JPL/Caltech, Pasadena, United States
Co-Sponsor(s):
Virtual Option?: No
Swirl Theme: Characterizing Uncertainty
Abstracts Submitted to this Session:
Measurement and Modeling of Cryosphere-Geosphere Interactions in South Central Alaska (6811)
Jeanne M Sauber1, Shin-Chan Han2, Scott B Luthcke1, Natalia A Ruppert3 and Ronald L Bruhn4, (1)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Geodesy and Geophysics Laboratory, Greenbelt, United States, (2)University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia, (3)US Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Seattle, United States, (4)Univ Utah, Hansville, WA, United States
Featuring lithosphere rheology in models of glacial isostatic adjustment (22622)
Volker Klemann1, Magdala Tesauro1,2 and Zdenek Martinec3,4, (1)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (2)Utrecht University, Department of Geosciences, Utrecht, Netherlands, (3)Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, School of Cosmic Physics, Dublin, Ireland, (4)Charles University, Department of Geophysics, Prague, Czech Republic
The POLENET-ANET integrated GPS and seismology approach to understanding glacial isostatic adjustment and ice mass change in Antarctica (23096)
Terry J Wilson, Ohio State University Main Campus, Columbus, OH, United States, Michael G Bevis, The Ohio State University, School of Earth Sciences, Columbus, United States, Stephanie Ann Konfal, Ohio State University Main Campus, Columbus, United States, Valentina R. Barletta, Technical University of Denmark - Space, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark, Richard C Aster, Colorado State University, Geosciences Department, Fort Collins, United States, Julien A Chaput, Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States, David Heeszel, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, United States, Douglas Wiens, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States, Andrew Jason Lloyd, Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY, United States and POLENET-ANET Team
GPS Measurements of Crustal Motion Indicate 3D GIA Models are Needed to Understand Antarctic Ice Mass Change (18537)
Stephanie Ann Konfal1, Terry J Wilson2, Michael G Bevis3, Eric C Kendrick3, Ian W D Dalziel4, Robert Smalley Jr5, Michael J Willis6, David Heeszel7, Douglas A Wiens8 and The POLENET Team, (1)Ohio State University, Columbus, United States, (2)Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, (3)The Ohio State University, School of Earth Sciences, Columbus, United States, (4)University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Geophysics, Austin, TX, United States, (5)University of Memphis, Center for Earthquake Research and Information, Memphis, TN, United States, (6)Cornell University, Ithaca, United States, (7)Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, United States, (8)Washington University in St Louis, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, St. Louis, MO, United States
Improved GIA correction yields larger Antarctic mass loss. (22204)
Isabella Velicogna, Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, United States, Tyler C Sutterley, University of California Irvine, Department of Earth System Science, Irvine, United States, Erik Roman Ivins, JPL/Caltech, Pasadena, United States and Michiel R van den Broeke, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Mass balance of Graham Land at present-day and over the past 150 years using GRACE and GNSS station data (16609)
Erik Roman Ivins1, David N Wiese2, Michael M Watkins3, Felix W Landerer4, Alexander Simms5, Dah-Ning Yuan2, Carmen Blackwood4 and Eugene W Domack6, (1)JPL/Caltech, Pasadena, United States, (2)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (5)University of California Santa Barbara, Earth Science, Santa Barbara, United States, (6)Hamilton College, Clinton, NY, United States
Inverting Glacial Isostatic Adjustment beyond linear viscoelasticity using Burgers rheology (21963)
Lambert Caron1, Marianne Greff-Lefftz2, Luce Fleitout3, Laurent Metivier4 and Helene Rouby3,5, (1)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Sea Level and Ice Group, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, (3)Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris, Paris, France, (4)IGN Institut National de l'Information Géographique et Forestière, Paris Cedex 13, France, (5)Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Variations in Mid-Ocean Ridge CO2 Emissions Driven By Glacial Cycles (6403)
Jonathan M Burley, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, Richard F Katz, University of Oxford, Department of Earth Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom and Peter J Huybers, Harvard University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, MA, United States
