G51B:
Gravity Data and Geoid Modeling: Methods, Theories, and Opportunities II Posters

Session ID#: 5070

Friday, 19 December 2014: 8:00 AM-12:20 PM
Not an Option (Moscone West)
Chairs:  Theresa Damiani, NOAA- Nat-l Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States and Vicki A Childers, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
Primary Convener:  Theresa Damiani, NOAA- Nat-l Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
Co-conveners:  Vicki A Childers, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States, David Avalos-Naranjo, INEGI, Aguascalientes, Mexico and Thomas J Johnson, NGA, Research, Burke, VA, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Theresa Damiani, NOAA- Nat-l Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
Index Terms:
Virtual Option?: No

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

 
Calculation of Stokes’ Integral on the Sphere Using 1D FFT (11509)
Elena M. Mazurova, SSGA, Geodesy, Moscow, Russia
 
Preliminary results of the Geoid Slope Validation Survey 2014 in Iowa (18127)
Yan Ming Wang1, Collin Becker2, Steve Breidenbach2, Charles Geoghegan2, Dan Martin2, Daniel Winester2, Timothy Hanson2, Gerald L Mader2 and Mark C Eckl2, (1)National Geodetic Survey, NOAA, Silver Spring, United States, (2)National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
 
Evaluation of Systematic Differences Between the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 and Release 5 GOCE Product (9475)
Daniel R Roman, National Geodetic Survey, HQ, Silver Spring, United States and Xiaopeng Li, DST at NGS, Geosciences Research Division, Silver Spring, United States
 
A hybrid geoid for the U.S. using empirical Bayesian kriging (22496)
Kevin M Kelly, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Software Development, Redlands, CA, United States and Konstantin Krivoruchko, ESRI, Redlands, CA, United States
 
New geoid of Greenland – a case study of terrain and ice effects, GOCE and local sea level data (21105)
Rene Forsberg, Technical University of Denmark, Space, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark and Tim Jensen, Technical University of Denmark, Space, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
 
Redetermination of the precise gravity fields around the Japanese Antarctic Station, Syowa, and evaluation of GOCE EGMs (14493)
Yoichi Fukuda, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Yoshifumi Nogi, National Institute of Polar Research (NIPR), Tachikawa, Japan and Kazuya Matsuzaki, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Geophysics, Kyoto, Japan
 
KGEOID12: A new hybrid geoid model in Korea (20015)
Dong-Ha Lee and Sunhui Sim, University of North Alabama, Geography, Florence, AL, United States
 
Sonmicat: Sea Level Observation System of Catalonia (9317)
Juan J Martinez-Benjamin1, Assumpcio Termens2, Antonio Ruiz2 and Silvia Gonzalez Lopez3, (1)Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain, (2)Institut Cartographic and Geologic of Cataloni, Barcelona, Spain, (3)Mapping & Co, Barcelona, Spain
 
Precise Astronomical Azimuth Determination By Qdaedalus System to the Sun, Moon, and Planets in Daytime Conditions (11144)
Lajos Völgyesi1, Gyula Tóth1, Beat Bürki2 and Sébastien Guillaume3, (1)Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Geodesy and Surveying, Budapest, Hungary, (2)ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, (3)La Haute Ecole d'Ingénierie et de Gestion du Canton de Vaud (HEIG-VD), Institute of Territorial Engineering, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland
 
Some Interesting Facts about Correlation Between Gravity Anomalies and Heights with Implications Towards the Correction Density Estimation (9184)
Ján Mikuška1, Ivan Marušiak1, Pavol Zahorec2, Juraj Papčo3, Roman Pasteka4 and Miroslav Bielik4, (1)G-trend, s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia, (2)The Geophysical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia, (3)Slovak Technical University, Bratislava, Slovakia, (4)Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
 
Dynamic Effects in Gravimetry: An Assessment of the Current State of Knowledge (Invited) (10307)
Theresa Damiani, NOAA- Nat-l Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
 
Assessing New Airborne Gravimetry Collected over New Zealand (6302)
Matt Amos1, Jack McCubbine2, Fabio Caratori Tontini3 and Rachelle Winefield1, (1)Land Information New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, (2)Victoria University of Wellington, School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Wellington, New Zealand, (3)University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
 
An Improved Platform Levelling System for Airborne Gravity Meters. (27774)
Mr. Nigel Brady, NOAA Denver, Denver, CO, United States
 
Use of Crossovers to Evaluate Airborne Gravity Data (30854)
Sandra A Preaux and Carly Weil, NOAA, Boulder, CO, United States
 
First Attempt of Applying Factor Analysis in Moving Base Gravimetry (9565)
Xiaopeng Li, Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States and Daniel R Roman, National Geodetic Survey, HQ, Silver Spring, United States
 
Requirements analysis of airborne gravity gradiometry on moving-based platform (27755)
Liangcheng Tu, Zhu Li and Wenjie Wu, Institute of Geophysics, School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
 
Absolute Gravity Datum in the Age of Cold Atom Gravimeters (29715)
Vicki A Childers, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States and Mark C Eckl, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
 
General Adjustment of the Fundamental Gravity Network in Mexico, Preliminary Results. (16964)
David Avalos-Naranjo1,2, Spiros D Pagiatakis3, Apolo Alvarado-Cortez1, Petr Vanicek2 and Marcelo C Santos2, (1)INEGI National Institute of Statistics and Geography, Aguascalientes, Mexico, (2)University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada, (3)York University, Department of Earth and Space Science, Toronto, ON, Canada
 
Gravity Change in Finland 1962-2010 from the Comparison of Legacy Relative Measurements with New Absolute Measurements Using the A10-020 Gravimeter (28911)
Jaakko Makinen1, Marcin Sekowski2, Jan S Krynski2, Jaakko Kuokkanen1, Jyri Naranen1, Arttu Raja-Halli1, Hannu E O Ruotsalainen1, Heikki Virtanen1 and Mirjam Bilker-Koivula1, (1)Finnish Geodetic Institute, Masala, Finland, (2)Institute of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw, Poland
 
Spatial and Temporal Variability of Water Storage in Dolomite Karst from Gravity Measurements (6477)
Cédric Champollion, Benjamin Fores, Jean Chery, Nicolas Le Moigne, Ouail Khairoun, Doerflinger Erik and Philippe Vernant, Laboratoire Geosciences, UMR 5243, Montpellier, France
 
A Re-Evaluation of the Relativistic Redshift on Frequency Standards at NIST, Boulder, Colorado, USA (7151)
Nikolaos K Pavlis, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, Washington, DC, United States and Marc A Weiss, National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, Time and Frequency Division, Boulder, CO, United States
See more of: Geodesy