A13L:
Using Atmospheric Measurements and Remote Sensing Data to Constrain Biosphere-Atmosphere Exchange Processes II Posters

Session ID#: 5231

Monday, 15 December 2014: 1:40 PM-6:00 PM
Poster Hall (Moscone_South)
Chairs:  Andrew E Schuh, Colorado State University, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, United States, Mathias Goeckede, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany and Abhishek Chatterjee, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States
Primary Convener:  Andrew E Schuh, Colorado State University, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, United States
Co-conveners:  Abhishek Chatterjee, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States and Mathias Goeckede, MPI Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
OSPA Liaison:  Mathias Goeckede, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
Co-Sponsor(s):
  • B - Biogeosciences
  • GC - Global Environmental Change
Index Terms:

0315 Biosphere/atmosphere interactions [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE]
0414 Biogeochemical cycles, processes, and modeling [BIOGEOSCIENCES]
0428 Carbon cycling [BIOGEOSCIENCES]
3315 Data assimilation [ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES]
Virtual Option?: No
Swirl Theme: Characterizing Uncertainty

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

 
A 4D-Var CO2 inversion system with NICAM-TM: development and sensitivity analyses (16509)
Yosuke Niwa1, Yosuke Fujii1, Yousuke Sawa2, Dr. Akihiko Ito3, Yosuke Iida4, Hirofumi Tomita5, Satoh Masaki6,7, Ryoichi Imasu7, Hidekazu Matsueda8, Toshinobu Machida9 and Nobuko Saigusa9, (1)Meteorological Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan, (2)Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan, (3)The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan, (4)Atmosphere and Ocean Department, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, Japan, (5)RIKEN, Kobe, Japan, (6)Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan, (7)AORI The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan, (8)Dokkyo University, Tsukuba, Japan, (9)CGER-NIES, Tsukuba, Japan
 
Model Analysis of the Factors Regulating Trends and Variability of Methane, Carbon Monoxide and OH (10229)
Yasin F Elshorbany1,2, Sarah A Strode1,3, James S Wang3,4 and Bryan N Duncan5, (1)University of South Florida, School of Geosciences, Tampa, United States, (2)University of South Florida, Tampa, School of Geosciences, Tampa, United States, (3)Universities Space Research Association Columbia, Columbia, MD, United States, (4)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (5)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, Greenbelt, MD, United States
 
Optimizing Photosynthetic and Respiratory Parameters Based on the Seasonal Variation Pattern in Regional Net Ecosystem Productivity Obtained from Atmospheric Inversion (7731)
Zhuoqi Chen, Beijing Normal University, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing, China, Jing Chen, University of Toronto, Geography and Planning, Toronto, ON, Canada, Xiaogu Zheng, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, Fei Jiang, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, Shupeng Zhang, Sun Yat-Sen University, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Guangzhou, China, Weimin Ju, Nanjing University, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing, China, Wenping Yuan, Sun Yat‐Sen University, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Guangzhou, China and Gang Mo, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
 
Carbon Flux Estimation By Using AGCM-Based Chemistry Transport Model for the Period 1990−2011 (8293)
Tazu Saeki, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan and Dr. Prabir Kumar Patra, PhD, JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Research Institute for Global Change, Yokohama, Japan
 
Using Carbonyl Sulfide Column Measurements and a Chemical Transport Model to Investigate Variability in Biospheric CO2 Fluxes (8615)
Yuting Wang1, Mathias Palm1, Nicholas M Deutscher1, Thorsten Warneke1, Justus Notholt1, Ian T Baker2, Joseph A Berry3, Parvadha Suntharalingam4, J Elliott Campbell5 and Adam Wolf6, (1)University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, Bremen, Germany, (2)Colorado State University, CIRA, Fort Collins, United States, (3)Carnegie Institution for Science, Department of Global Ecology, Stanford, United States, (4)University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom, (5)University of California Merced, Merced, United States, (6)Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
 
Sensitivity of Estimated Surface CO2 Flux on Parameters Used in a Carbon Data Assimilation System (14463)
HyunJung KIM1, Hyun Mee Kim2, Jinwoong Kim1 and Chun-Ho Cho3, (1)Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), (2)Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea, (3)National Institute of Meteorological Research, Jeju, Korea, Republic of (South)
 
Uncertainty in CO2 Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Explains Discrepancies in a Critical Parameter for Quantifying GPP with Carbonyl Sulfide (18548)
Timothy W Hilton1, Andrew Lee Zumkehr1, Sarika Kulkarni2, Joseph A Berry3, Mary Whelan4 and J Elliott Campbell5, (1)University of California Merced, Merced, CA, United States, (2)California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, United States, (3)Carnegie Institution for Science, Department of Global Ecology, Stanford, United States, (4)University of California Los Angeles, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (5)University of California Merced, Merced, United States
 
The Anthropogenic Influence on Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide: Implications for Inverse Analysis of Process-Level Carbon Cycle Fluxes (8984)
Andrew Lee Zumkehr1, Timothy W Hilton1, Mary Whelan2, Stephen J Smith3 and J Elliott Campbell4, (1)University of California Merced, Merced, CA, United States, (2)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, (3)Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, MD, United States, (4)University of California Merced, Merced, United States
 
Optimal Estimation of the Carbonyl Sulfide Surface Flux Through Inverse Modeling of TES Observations (28779)
Le Kuai1, John Worden2, Meemong Lee2, J Elliott Campbell3, Susan Sund Kulawik2 and Richard J Weidner2, (1)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (2)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)University of California Merced, Merced, United States
 
Pigc - a Low Cost Solution for Air Quality Monitoring and Methane Detection (9628)
Larry L Gordley1, David C Fritts2, Benjamin T Marshall1 and Richard L. Lachance3, (1)GATS, Inc., Newport News, VA, United States, (2)Global Atmospheric Technologies and Sciences (GATS), Boulder, United States, (3)ABB, Quebec, Canada
 
Direct Continuous Measurements of Methane Emissions from a Landfill: Method, Station and Latest Results (7999)
George G Burba1, Liukang Xu2, Xiaomao Lin3, Jim Amen2, Karla Welding4 and Dayle K McDermitt5, (1)LI-COR, Lincoln, United States, (2)LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, United States, (3)Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy, Manhattan, United States, (4)Bluff Road Landfill, Lincoln, NE, United States, (5)LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, United States
 
Investigation of methane flux in South Asia using atmospheric measurements at Nainital, India and global Eulerian-Lagrangian coupled atmospheric model (20893)
Yukio Terao1, Misa Ishizawa1, Hitoshi Mukai1, Manish Kumar Naja2, Shohei Nomura1, Toshinobu Machida1, Ruslan Zhuravlev3,4, Alexander Ganshin3,4 and Shamil S Maksyutov1, (1)National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, (2)Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences, Nainital, India, (3)Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia, (4)Central Aerological Observatory, Moscow, Russia
 
Assessing the Complementary Constraints on North American Methane Emissions Estimates Provided by Ground-based and Space-based Observations of Methane (18915)
Ilya Stanevich1, Dylan B. A. Jones1, Kimberly Strong2, Wei Lu1, John C Lin3, Arlyn Andrews4, Doug E. J. Worthy5, Kevin Wecht6, Paul O Wennberg7, Debra Wunch8, Coleen Marie Roehl9 and Manvendra Krishna Dubey10, (1)University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, (2)University of Toronto, Physics, Toronto, ON, Canada, (3)University of Utah, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, (4)NOAA Boulder, Boulder, United States, (5)Environment Canada Toronto, Climate Research Division, Toronto, ON, Canada, (6)Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States, (7)California Institute of Technology, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, Pasadena, United States, (8)University of Toronto, Department of Physics, Toronto, ON, Canada, (9)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (10)Los Alamos National Laboratory, Earth and Environmental Science Division, Los Alamos, United States
 
The Effects of Stratospheric Chemistry and Transport on the Isotopic Compositions of Long-Lived Gases Measured at Earth's Surface (20787)
Amadu M Kanu, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States and Kristie A Boering, University of California Berkeley, Chemistry and Earth & Planetary Science, Berkeley, CA, United States
 
A Global Synthesis Inversion Analysis of Recent Variability in Natural CO2 Fluxes Using Gosat and in Situ Observations (9078)
James S Wang1,2, Stephan R Kawa1 and George James Collatz1, (1)NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (2)Universities Space Research Association Columbia, Columbia, MD, United States
 
Parameter estimation and data assimilation with the Community Land Model (CLM) to upscale net CO2 fluxes from plot to catchment scale (22126)
Hanna Post1, Timothy J Hoar2, Jasper A Vrugt3, Xujun Han1, Roland Baatz1, Kumbhar Pramod4, Harry Vereecken5 and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen1, (1)Agrosphere Institute (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany, (2)NCAR, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States, (4)École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland, (5)Forschungszentrum Jülich, Agrosphere Institute (IBG-3), Jülich, Germany
 
Characterization of a Densely Placed Carbon Observation Network (23117)
Brian Johannes Oney1, Dominik Brunner2, Stephan Henne2, Markus Leuenberger3, Ines Bamberger4 and Nicolas Gruber5, (1)Empa, Duebendorf, Switzerland, (2)Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Duebendorf, Switzerland, (3)Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland, (4)University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, (5)ETH Zurich, Environmental Systems Science, Zurich, Switzerland
 
Estimating correlations of CO and CO2 surface fluxes (23501)
Brad Weir1,2, Steven Pawson3, Lesley Ott1, Krzysztof Wargan3,4, Jon Nielsen1,5 and Ricardo Todling1, (1)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (2)Universities Space Research Association Greenbelt, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (3)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, United States, (4)Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, United States, (5)Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, MD, United States
 
A Multimodel Carbon Assimilation System Using a Modified Ensemble Kalman Filter and Bayesian Model Averaging Scheme (27689)
Shupeng Zhang1, Xiaogu Zheng2, Zhuoqi Chen3, Jing Chen4, Guocan Wu2 and Xue Yi2, (1)Sun Yat-Sen University, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Guangzhou, China, (2)Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, (3)Beijing Normal University, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing, China, (4)University of Toronto, Geography and Planning, Toronto, ON, Canada
 
Effect of Atmospheric CO2 Observations in Asia on the Optimization of Surface CO2 Flux (14526)
Jinwoong Kim1, Hyun Mee Kim2, Chun-Ho Cho3, Andrew R Jacobson4,5, Motoki Sasakawa6, Toshinobu Machida6, Mikhail Arshinov7 and Nikolay Fedoseev8, (1)Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), (2)Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea, (3)National Institute of Meteorological Research, Jeju, Korea, Republic of (South), (4)NOAA, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, United States, (5)University of Colorado at Boulder, CIRES, Boulder, United States, (6)National Institute of Environmental Studies, Earth System Division, Tsukuba, Japan, (7)V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics, Tomsk, Russia, (8)Russian Academy of Sciences, Melnikov Permafrost Institute, Yakutsk, Russia
 
Analysis of the Potential Impact of Discrepancies in Stratosphere-troposphere Exchange on Inferred Sources and Sinks of CO2 (29115)
Dylan B. A. Jones1,2, Feng Deng2, Thomas W Walker2, Martin Keller2, Kevin W Bowman3,4 and Ray Nassar5, (1)University of California Los Angeles, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, Los Angeles, United States, (2)University of Toronto, Physics, Toronto, ON, Canada, (3)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, (4)University of California Los Angeles, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (5)Environment and Climate Change Canada, Climate Research Division, Toronto, ON, Canada