A41G:
Remote Sensing of the Carbon Cycle: Exploiting New Measurements and Linkages to the Water Cycle I Posters

Session ID#: 5252

Thursday, 18 December 2014: 8:00 AM-12:20 PM
Poster Hall (Moscone_South)
Chairs:  Dr. David Crisp, Crisp Spectra LLC, Sedona, United States, Christopher O'Dell, Colorado State University, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, United States and Charles E Miller, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States
Primary Convener:  Christopher O'Dell, Colorado State University, Atmospheric Science, Fort Collins, CO, United States
Co-conveners:  Annmarie Eldering, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, John Worden, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States and Charles E Miller, JPL/NASA/Caltech, Pasadena, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Annmarie Eldering, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
Index Terms:

0315 Biosphere/atmosphere interactions [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE]
0365 Troposphere: composition and chemistry [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE]
3360 Remote sensing [ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES]
Virtual Option?: No

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

 
Assessment of Oco-2 Target Mode Vulnerability Against Horizontal Variability of Surface Reflectivity Neglected in the Operational Forward Model (6709)
Anthony B Davis, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States and Zheng Qu, Raytheon/JPL, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
Accelerating 3D radiative transfer for realistic OCO-2 cloud-aerosol scenes (22721)
Sebastian Schmidt1, Steven T Massie1,2, Steven E Platnick3 and Shi Song4, (1)University of Colorado at Boulder, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, United States, (2)Natl Ctr Atmospheric Research, Boulder, United States, (3)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (4)University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States
 
OCO2 3D Radiative Transfer Calculations (16286)
Steven T Massie1,2 and Sebastian Schmidt2, (1)Natl Ctr Atmospheric Research, Boulder, United States, (2)University of Colorado at Boulder, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, United States
 
Evaluating Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) Nadir and Glint Observing Sequences (9422)
Ray Nassar1, Feng Deng2, Saroja M Polavarapu3, Mike Neish1, Dylan B. A. Jones4 and Christopher O'Dell5, (1)Environment and Climate Change Canada, Climate Research Division, Toronto, ON, Canada, (2)University of Toronto, Physics, Toronto, ON, Canada, (3)Environment Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, (4)University of Toronto, Department of Physics, Toronto, ON, Canada, (5)Colorado State University, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, United States
 
Development of the inverse model for estimation of the surface CO2 fluxes at grid scale and high resolution with GOSAT data (12220)
Shamil S Maksyutov1, Dr. Akihiko Ito2, Tomohiro Oda3,4, Johannes W Kaiser5, Dmitry Belikov1,6, Rajesh Janardanan Achari1, Alexey Yaremchuk7, Ruslan Zhuravlev8,9, Alexander Ganshin8,9 and Vinu Valsala10, (1)National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, (2)The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, (3)Colorado State University, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, United States, (5)Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany, (6)NIPR National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo, Japan, (7)N. N. Andreyev Acoustics Institute, Moscow, Russia, (8)Central Aerological Observatory, Moscow, Russia, (9)Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia, (10)Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, India
 
An Assessment of Biases in Satellite CO2 Measurements Using Atmospheric Inversion (29921)
David F Baker, Colorado State University, CIRA, Fort Collins, United States, Christopher O'Dell, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States and TCCON partners
 
Differences in satellite CO2 data coverage and their influence on regional flux constraints (20786)
Hiroshi Takagi1, Robert J Andres2, Dmitry Belikov3, Hartmut Boesch4, Andrey Bril3, Andre Butz5, Makoto Inoue3, Isamu Morino6, Tomohiro Oda7, Christopher O'Dell8, Sergey Oshchepkov9, Robert Parker4, Makoto Saito10, Osamu Uchino11, Vinu Valsala12, Tatsuya Yokota13, Yukio Yoshida3 and Shamil S Maksyutov10, (1)National Institute of Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan, (2)Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States, (3)NIES National Institute of Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan, (4)University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom, (5)German Aerospace Center, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Oberpfaffenhofen-Wessling, Germany, (6)National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan, (7)Colorado State University, Boulder, CO, United States, (8)Colorado State University, Atmospheric Sciences, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (9)NIES, Tsukuba, Japan, (10)National Institute for Environmental Studies, Satellite Observation Center, Tsukuba, Japan, (11)NIES National Institute of Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, (12)Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, India, (13)CGER, NIES, Ibaraki, Japan
 
Quantifying Regional Sources and Sinks of CO2 Using Data From GOSAT and TES (28056)
Feng Deng1, Dylan B. A. Jones1,2, Nicolas Bousserez3, Susan Sund Kulawik4, Daven K Henze5, Kevin W Bowman6,7 and Ray Nassar8, (1)University of Toronto, Physics, Toronto, ON, Canada, (2)University of California Los Angeles, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, Los Angeles, United States, (3)University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (5)University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States, (6)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, (7)University of California Los Angeles, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (8)Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
 
Pseudo-data Inversions of California CO2 Fluxes Combining Tower Measurements of CO2 and 14CO2 with OCO2 Column CO2 Retrievals (19219)
Marc Laurenz Fischer1, Seongeun Jeong2, Justin E Bagley2, Christian Frankenberg3, Nick Parazoo4, Ralph F Keeling5 and Heather D Graven6, (1)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States, (2)Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, CA, United States, (3)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (4)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (5)University of California San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, United States, (6)Imperial College London, Physics, London, SW7, United Kingdom
 
Husbandry Trace Gas Emissions from a Dairy Complex By Mobile in Situ and Airborne and Spaceborne Remote Sensing: A Comex Campaign Focus (8952)
Ira Leifer1, David M Tratt2, Heinrich Bovensmann3, Kerry N Buckland4, John Philip Burrows FRS5, Jason Frash6, Konstantin Gerilowski5, Laura T Iraci7, Patrick D Johnson2, Richard Kolyer8, Sven Krautwurst5, Thomas Krings3, J. Brian Leen9, Chuanmin Hu10, Christopher Melton11, Samuel A Vigil12, Emma L Yates8 and Minwei Zhang13, (1)Bubbleology Research International, Solvang, United States, (2)Aerospace Corporation Pasadena, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany, (4)Aerospace Corporation, Los Angeles, United States, (5)University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP), Bremen, Germany, (6)Bubbleology Research International LLC, Santa Barbara, CA, United States, (7)NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, United States, (8)NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States, (9)Nikira Labs, Inc., Mountain View, United States, (10)University of South Florida St. Petersburg, Optical Oceanography, St Petersburg, FL, United States, (11)Bubbleology Research International LLC, Santa Barbara, United States, (12)California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA, United States, (13)Science Applications International Corporation, Alexandria, United States
 
Field Spectroradiometer Characterization of Solar-Induced Fluorescence to Monitor Plant Health, Estimate Carbon Flux, and Application as Ground-Truth Data (22011)
Trina L Merrick, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States, Ralf Bennartz, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, United States; Vanderbilt University, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Nashville, United States and John Rausch, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States
 
Understanding moisture stress on light-use efficiency based on MODIS and global flux tower data (28076)
Dr. Yulong Zhang, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Geography, Chapel Hill, NC, United States, Conghe Song, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Geography and Environment, Chapel Hill, NC, United States and Ge Sun, USDA Forest Svc, Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Raleigh, NC, United States
 
Response of High Latitude Wetland Fluxes of Methane to Changes in Temperature and Water (18066)
John Worden1, A Anthony Bloom2, Kevin W Bowman3, Meemong Lee4, Christian Frankenberg3 and David Schimel1, (1)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (3)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, (4)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
Spring Hydrology Determines Summer Net Carbon Uptake in Northern Ecosystems (7566)
Dr. Yonghong Yi, University of California Los Angeles, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, Los Angeles, United States, John S Kimball, University of Montana, Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, Missoula, United States, Rolf H Reichle, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, United States and Michael A Rawlins, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States
 
Three Years of CARVE-FTS Observations of CO2, CH4, and CO in the Alaskan Arctic: Status Quo and Comparison with Satellite Measurements (17653)
Thomas p Kurosu, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, Charles E Miller, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, Steven J Dinardo, Jet Propulsion Lab, Pasadena, CA, United States and CARVE Science Team
 
Arctic Methane: the View from Space (29044)
Leonid Yurganov, JCET, Baltimore, MD, United States, Ira Leifer, Bubbleology Research International, Solvang, United States; Bubbleology Research International LLC, Santa Barbara, CA, United States and Xiaozhen Xiong, NOAA Science Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, NOAA, USA, Clarksville, United States