Abstract: Pressure and temperature dependence of OH and HO<sub>2</sub> detection sensitivities for an LIF based FAGE instrument – a comparison of calibration methods. (2015 AGU Fall Meeting)

Pressure and temperature dependence of OH and HO₂ detection sensitivities for an LIF based FAGE instrument – a comparison of calibration methods.

Frank Winiberg¹, Iustinian Bejan², Charlotte Brumby³, Luke N Farrugia³, Tamsin Leanne Malkin⁴, Shona C Smith^4,5, Stephanie C Orr⁴, Dwayne E Heard⁶ and Paul W Seakins⁷, (1)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (2)Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Chemistry, Iasi, Romania, (3)University of Leeds, Chemistry, Leeds, United Kingdom, (4)University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, (5)Newcastle University, Institute for Sustainability, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, (6)University of Leeds, School of Chemistry, Leeds, LS2, United Kingdom, (7)University of Leeds, School of Chemistry, Leeds, United Kingdom

Back to: Advances in Instrumentation and Methods for Atmospheric Chemistry I

Pressure and temperature dependence of OH and HO2 detection sensitivities for an LIF based FAGE instrument – a comparison of calibration methods.

Pressure and temperature dependence of OH and HO₂ detection sensitivities for an LIF based FAGE instrument – a comparison of calibration methods.