NS51B:
Geophysical Methods for Groundwater Evaluation and Management II


Session ID#: 7471

Session Description:
Effective, sustainable management of groundwater resources requires accurate knowledge of aquifer properties, groundwater recharge, storage, and withdrawal. In this session we focus on the application of geophysical methods using subsurface, surface, airborne, or satellite sensors to quantify aquifer properties and processes. Of interest are examples related to all aspects of groundwater management including, but not limited to, development of hydrostratigraphic models, assessment of aquifer properties, evaluation of groundwater quantity and quality, monitoring of natural/managed processes. All approaches are of interest including laboratory and field experiments, theoretical and numerical modeling.

Primary Convener:  John W Lane Jr, USGS Hydrogeophysics Branch, Storrs, CT, United States
Convener:  Rosemary J Knight, Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, United States
Chairs:  John W Lane Jr, USGS Groundwater Information, Reston, VA, United States and Rosemary J Knight, Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Rosemary J Knight, Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • H - Hydrology
Index Terms:

1835 Hydrogeophysics [HYDROLOGY]
1847 Modeling [HYDROLOGY]
1855 Remote sensing [HYDROLOGY]
1880 Water management [HYDROLOGY]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Shakeel Ahmed, CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Indo-French Center for Groundwater Research, Hyderabad, India, Subash Chandra, National Geophysical Research Institute, Electrical Geophysics, Hyderabad, India, Esben Auken, Aarhus University, Institute for Geoscience, Aarhus C, Denmark and Saurabh Kumar Verma, Natl Geophysical Res Inst, Hyderabad, India
Torben Bach1, Mats Lundh Gulbrandsen2, Rikke Jacobsen1, Tom Martlev Pallesen2, Flemming Jørgensen3, Anne-Sophie Høyer3 and Thomas Mejer Hansen4, (1)I-GIS A/S, GeoScene3D Team, Risskov, Denmark, (2)I•GIS, Risskov, Denmark, (3)Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Groundwater and Quaternary Geology Mapping, Aarhus, Denmark, (4)Niels Bohr Institute - University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Robert L Carruth, USGS Arizona Water Science Center, Tucson, AZ, United States and Brian D Conway, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, AZ, United States
Konstantinos Sacha Papadimitrios1, Grant Ferris2 and Carl-Georg Bank1, (1)University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, (2)University of Toronto, Department of Earth Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
Dean Whitman, Florida International University, Earth and Environment, Miami, United States, Rene Price, Florida International University, Earth and Environment, Miami, FL, United States, Tom Frankovich, Florida International Univ, Institute of Environment, Miami, United States and James W Fourqurean, Florida International Univ, Miami, FL, United States
Lin Zhu1, Zhenxue Dai2, Yinghai Ke3, Yun Pan4, Huili Gong1 and Yongyong Li5, (1)CNU Capital Nornal University, College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Beijing, China, (2)Jilin University, College of Construction Engineering, Changchun, China, (3)Capital Nornal University, Beijing, China, (4)Capital Normal University, College of Resources Environment & Tourism, Beijing, China, (5)CNU Capital Normal University, College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Beijing, China
Chunfen Zeng, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China