H23E:
Intercomparison Studies of Hydrological Models: Beyond Comparing Streamflows, Snow Water Equivalent, and Evapotranspiration Posters


Session ID#: 8414

Session Description:
In water resource engineering, the spatiotemporal resolution and physics behind hydrologic models used in climate / land cover change assessments can have a significant impact on the outcomes. To compare models, there exists, on one end, a few theoretical problems and, on the other, there is a wide range of monitored rivers.  While theoretical problems have analytical / numerical solutions, routinely forecast river systems provide basic hydrometeorological data which have been used in intercomparison studies (e.g., Distributed Model Intercomparison Project). Meanwhile, there are experimental watersheds (e.g., Critical Zone Observatory) that can provide at various scales hydrologic variables such as streamflows, snow water equivalent, evapotranspiration, etc.  Abstracts are solicited on comprehensive intercomparison studies of hydrologic models using benchmarks including theoretical problems as well as point- and watershed-scale data.  Special focus will be on studies that have developed a robust methodology at the watershed scale using distributed simulation and observed data sets.
Primary Convener:  Alain N Rousseau, Professeur-chercheur titulaire, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique-Eau Terre Environnement INRS-ETE, Eau Terre Environnement, Quebec City, QC, Canada
Conveners:  Xuan Yu, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States, Christopher Duffy, The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University Park, PA, United States and Chaopeng Shen, Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University Park, United States
Chairs:  Alain N Rousseau, Professeur-chercheur titulaire, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique-Eau Terre Environnement INRS-ETE, Eau Terre Environnement, Quebec City, QC, Canada and Xuan Yu, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Alain N Rousseau, Professeur-chercheur titulaire, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique-Eau Terre Environnement INRS-ETE, Eau Terre Environnement, Quebec City, QC, Canada
Index Terms:

1805 Computational hydrology [HYDROLOGY]
1836 Hydrological cycles and budgets [HYDROLOGY]
1848 Monitoring networks [HYDROLOGY]
1879 Watershed [HYDROLOGY]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Examination of different water balance models for use with tree-ring proxy records to extend hydroclimatic records (62276)
Laurel Saito1, Franco Biondi2 and Rajan Devkota2, (1)University of Nevada Reno, Natural Resources and Environmental Science, Reno, NV, United States, (2)University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV, United States
A Controlled Approach to Model Comparison and Improvement: Insights from the Reynolds Creek Critical Zone Observatory (63739)
Martyn P Clark, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, United States
Global Evaluation of Streamflow from Ten State-of-the-Art Hydrologic Models (64413)
Hylke Beck1, A.P.J. De Roo1, Jaap Schellekens2 and Albert van Dijk3, (1)Joint Research Center Ispra, Water Resources Unit, Ispra, Italy, (2)Deltares, Delft, Netherlands, (3)Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
The HyperHydro (H^2) experiment for comparing different large-scale models at various resolutions (65409)
Edwin Sutanudjaja1, Joyce Bosmans2, Nathaniel W. Chaney3, Martyn P Clark4, Laura E Condon5, Cedric H David6, A.P.J. De Roo7, Petra M Doll8, Niels Drost9, Stephanie Eisner10, James S Famiglietti11, Martina Floerke12, James M Gilbert13, David J Gochis14, Rolf Hut15, Jessica Keune16, Stefan J Kollet17, Reed M Maxwell5, Ming Pan18, Oldrich Rakovec19, John T Reager II20, Luis Samaniego21, Hannes Mueller Schmied22, Tim Trautmann8, Ludovicus P Van Beek23, Nick Van De Giesen24, Eric F Wood25, Marc FP Bierkens23 and Rohini Kumar26, (1)Utrecht University, Physical Geography, Utrecht, Netherlands, (2)Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584, Netherlands, (3)Duke University, Durham, United States, (4)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, United States, (5)Colorado School of Mines, Hydrologic Science and Engineering Program and Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, Golden, CO, United States, (6)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, (7)European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy, (8)Univ Franfurt/Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, (9)Netherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, (10)University of Kassel, Center for Environmental Systems Research (CESR), Kassel, Germany, (11)University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States, (12)University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany, (13)University of California Santa Cruz & NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Golden, United States, (14)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States, (15)Delft University of Technology, Water Management, Delft, Netherlands, (16)Ghent University, Hydro-Climate Extremes Lab (H-CEL), Gent, Belgium, (17)Research Center Juelich, Jülich, Germany, (18)Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes (CW3E), Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, La Jolla, United States, (19)Czech University of Life Sciences, Water Resources and Environmental Modelling, Prague, Czech Republic, (20)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (21)Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ Leipzig, Computation Hydrosystems, Leipzig, Germany, (22)Goethe University Frankfurt, Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Institute of Physical Geography, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, (23)Utrecht University, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht, Netherlands, (24)Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft, Netherlands, (25)Princeton University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton, NJ, United States, (26)Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research GmbH – UFZ, Leipzig, Germany, Computational Hydrosystems, Leipzig, Germany
Comparing snow models under current and future climates over three Nordic catchments: uncertainties and implications for hydrological impact studies (67112)
Magali Troin1, Annie Poulin2, Michel Baraer2 and François Brissette2, (1)Ouranos, Montreal, QC, Canada, (2)École de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal, QC, Canada
Improving evapotranspiration processes in distrubing hydrological models using Remote Sensing derived ET products. (82364)
Ann van Griensven, Tadesse Alemayehu Abitew and Willy Bauwens, Vrije Universiteit Brussel - VUB, Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Brussels, Belgium
Diagnostic testing and evaluation of the community WRF-Hydro Modeling System for national streamflow prediction application (83378)
Arezoo Rafieeinasab1, David Gochis2, Aubrey L Dugger2, Linlin Pan3, James L McCreight2, Wei Yu4, Yongxin Zhang5, David N Yates6, Marcelo A Somos-Valenzuela7, Fernando Renzo Salas8 and David R Maidment9, (1)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Research Applications Laboratory, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)National Ctr Atmospheric Res, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)Weather Tech Services, LLC, Boulder, CO, United States, (5)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, United States, (6)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Research Applications Laboratory, Boulder, United States, (7)University of La Frontera, Department of Forest Sciences, Temuco, Chile, (8)NOAA Office of Water Prediction, National Water Center, Geo-Intelligence Division, Tuscaloosa, United States, (9)CRWR, Austin, United States
Catchment Classification via Hydrologic Modeling: Evaluating the Relative Importance of Model Selection, Parameterization and Classification Techniques (85369)
Lucy Amanda Marshall, University of New South Wales, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Tyler J Smith, Clarkson University, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Potsdam, NY, United States and Lennox To, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
The Great Lakes Runoff Intercomparison Project (GRIP): Phase II, Lake Ontario  (85421)
Bryan Tolson1, Étienne Thomas É. M. Gaborit2, Andrew Gronewold3, Vincent Fortin4, Lauren M Fry5 and Timothy Hunter3, (1)University of Waterloo, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Waterloo, ON, Canada, (2)Environment and Climate Change Canada, Meteorological Research Division, Dorval, QC, Canada, (3)University of Michigan, School for Environment and Sustainability, Ann Arbor, United States, (4)Hydro-Québec, Montreal, Canada, (5)NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, United States
Comparing Sediment Yield Predictions from Different Hydrologic Modeling Schemes (85618)
Travis A Dahl, Michigan State University, Earth and Environmental Sciences, East Lansing, MI, United States, Anthony D Kendall, Michigan State University, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, East Lansing, MI, United States and David W Hyndman, Michigan State University, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, East Lansing, United States

See more of: Hydrology