GC11B:
Carbon Monitoring Systems Research and Applications I Posters


Session ID#: 8514

Session Description:
Greenhouse gas emission inventories, forest carbon sequestration programs (e.g., Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD and REDD+), cap-and-trade systems, self-reporting programs, and their associated monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) frameworks depend upon data that are accurate, systematic, practical, and transparent.  For carbon, there are multiple monitoring, reporting, and verification frameworks in existence, reflecting a diversity of spatial scales, governing bodies, and relevant policies. Recently, the U.S. congress directed NASA to develop and prototype carbon monitoring system approaches in support of these and other applications.  Given the scientific challenges, policy importance, and breadth of activities occurring, this session will focus on research and applications (decision support and policy) of carbon monitoring system science and its alignment with stakeholder needs.
Primary Convener:  George C Hurtt, University of Maryland College Park, Department of Geographical Sciences, College Park, MD, United States
Conveners:  Sangram Ganguly, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States and Vanessa M Escobar, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Science Systems and Applications, Greenbelt, MD, United States
Chairs:  George C Hurtt, University of Maryland College Park, Department of Geographical Sciences, College Park, MD, United States and Sangram Ganguly, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States
OSPA Liaison:  George C Hurtt, University of Maryland College Park, Department of Geographical Sciences, College Park, MD, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • A - Atmospheric Sciences
  • B - Biogeosciences
  • OS - Ocean Sciences
  • PA - Public Affairs
Index Terms:

0315 Biosphere/atmosphere interactions [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE]
0428 Carbon cycling [BIOGEOSCIENCES]
1631 Land/atmosphere interactions [GLOBAL CHANGE]
1694 Instruments and techniques [GLOBAL CHANGE]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Enabling global collaborations through policy engagement and CMS applications (81654)
Edil Sepulveda Carlo, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center / SSAI, Greenbelt, MD, United States, Vanessa M Escobar, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Science Systems and Applications, Greenbelt, MD, United States and Sabrina Delgado Arias, Science Systems and Applications, Inc. - NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, United States
Understanding user needs for carbon monitoring information (82411)
Riley Duren1, Molly Macauley2, Kevin R Gurney3, Sassan S Saatchi1, Christopher W Woodall4, Kate Larsen5, David Reidmiller6, Leif Hockstad7, Melissa Weitz8, Bart Eric Croes9, Adrian Down10,11, Tris West12 and Michael Mercury1, (1)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, United States, (3)Northern Arizona University, School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Flagstaff, AZ, United States, (4)US Forest Service St. Paul, St. Paul, MN, United States, (5)Rhodium Group, Oakland, CA, United States, (6)US Department of State, Washington, DC, United States, (7)Environmental Protection Agency Washington DC, Washington, DC, United States, (8)US Environmental Protection Agency - Washington DC, Washington, United States, (9)California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, United States, (10)Department of Energy Washington DC, Energy Policy and Systems Analysis, Washington, DC, United States, (11)Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, United States, (12)White House Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, United States
Overview of ARB’s Greenhouse Gas Research Program (85037)
Matthias Falk1, Yanju Chen2, Toshihiro Kuwayama2, Abhilash Vijayan2, Jorn Herner2 and Bart Eric Croes2, (1)California Air Resources Board, Research Division, Sacramento, CA, United States, (2)California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, United States
Compact Solar Spectrometer Column CO2, and CH4 Observations: Performance Evaluation at Multiple North American TCCON Sites (83025)
Harrison Alexander Parker1, Jacob Hedelius2, Camille Viatte2, Debra Wunch3, Paul O Wennberg4, Jia Chen5, Stephen Wofsy6, Taylor Jones6, Jonathan Franklin6, Manvendra Krishna Dubey1, Coleen Marie Roehl2, James Robert Podolske7, Patrick W Hillyard8 and Laura T Iraci9, (1)Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States, (2)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)University of Toronto, Department of Physics, Toronto, ON, Canada, (4)California Institute of Technology, Division of Engineering and Applied Science, Pasadena, United States, (5)Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Munich, Germany, (6)Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States, (7)NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States, (8)Bay Area Environmental Research Institute Moffett Field, Moffett Field, CA, United States, (9)NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, United States
Initial Results from an Atmospheric Validation of Urban Greenhouse Gas Budget Estimates for the US Northeast Corridor (71221)
Thomas Nehrkorn1, Steven C Wofsy2, Lucy Hutyra3, Phil DeCola4, William Callahan5, Maryann R Sargent6, Kathryn McKain7, Yanina Barrera8, Taylor Jones8, Conor Gately9, Brady S Hardiman10, Marikate Ellis Mountain11, John Henderson12, George James Collatz13, Crystal L Schaaf10, Charles E Miller14, Amanda Long5, Christopher Sloop5 and Steve Prinzivalli15, (1)Atmospheric and Environmental Research Lexington, Lexington, MA, United States, (2)Harvard University, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, United States, (3)Boston University, Earth & Environment, Boston, MA, United States, (4)Sigma Space Corporation, Lanham, United States, (5)Earth Networks Inc., Germantown, MD, United States, (6)Harvard University, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA, United States, (7)NOAA ESRL Global Monitoring Division, Boulder, United States, (8)Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States, (9)Harvard University, Boston, United States, (10)Boston University, Boston, MA, United States, (11)Verisk Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, United States, (12)Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, MA, United States, (13)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (14)JPL/NASA/Caltech, Pasadena, United States, (15)Earth Networks Inc., Germantown, United States
Revised spatially distributed global livestock emissions (73562)
Julie Wolf1, Ghassem Asrar1 and Tristram O West2, (1)Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, MD, United States, (2)Joint Global Change Res. Inst., College Park, MD, United States
National Satellite Land Monitoring Systems for REDD+ : the UN-REDD support to countries (80675)
Inge G.C. Jonckheere, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy and UN-REDD Team FAO
Local Discrepancies in Continental Scale Biomass Maps: A Case Study over Forested and Non-Forested Landscapes in Maryland, USA (72198)
Wenli Huang1, Anu Swatantran2, Kristofer D Johnson3, Laura Duncanson4, Hao Tang4, Jarlath ONeil-Dunne5, George C Hurtt1,2 and Ralph Dubayah2,4, (1)University of Maryland College Park, Department of Geographical Sciences, College Park, MD, United States, (2)University of Maryland, Department of Geographical Sciences, College Park, MD, United States, (3)U.S. Forest Service, Newtown Square, PA, United States, (4)University of Maryland College Park, Geographical Sciences, College Park, MD, United States, (5)University of Vermont, Rubenstein School of Environment & Natural Resources, Burlington, VT, United States
Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Industrial Forest Clearcuts in the Conterminous United States (79837)
Lian-Zhi Huo, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States and Luigi Boschetti, University of Idaho, Department of Forest, Rangeland and Fire Sciences, Moscow, ID, United States
Quantification of uncertainty in aboveground biomass estimates derived from small-footprint LiDAR data (81512)
Jonathan A Greenberg1, Bo Li2, Carlos Ramirez3, Qing Xu2, James Joseph Balamuta2, Kirk Evans3, Albert Man2 and Zewei Xu2, (1)University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Department of Geography and Geographic Information Science, Urbana, IL, United States, (2)University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, (3)USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region Remote Sensing Lab, McClellan, CA, United States
Monitoring and Modeling of Large-Scale Pattern of Forest Height and Biomass based on the Metabolic Scaling Theory and Water-Energy Balance Equation (59157)
Sungho CHOI1, Ranga B Myneni2, Yuri Knyazikhin2 and Taejin Park3, (1)Boston University, Boston, MA, United States, (2)Boston University, Earth and Environment, Boston, MA, United States, (3)Boston University, Earth and Environment, Boston, United States
A High Performance Computing Approach to Tree Cover Delineation in 1-m NAIP Imagery using a Probabilistic Learning Framework (76446)
Saikat Basu1, Sangram Ganguly2, Andrew Michaelis3, Petr Votava3, Anshuman Roy4, Supratik Mukhopadhyay1 and Ramakrishna R Nemani2, (1)Louisiana State University, Computer Science, Baton Rouge, LA, United States, (2)NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States, (3)California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA, United States, (4)Rhombus Power Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
Mapping 2002-2012 Aboveground Biomass Carbon from LiDAR and Landsat Time Series across Northern Idaho, USA (82310)
Andrew T Hudak1, Patrick Fekety2, Michael Falkowski2, Robert E Kennedy3, Nicholas Crookston4 and Alistair MS Smith5, (1)USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, United States, (2)Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (3)Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States, (4)Private Forestry Consultant, Moscow, ID, United States, (5)University of Idaho, Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, Moscow, ID, United States
Impacts of Sample Design on Estimation of Aboveground Biomass: Implications for the Assimilation of Lidar and Forest Inventory Data (86434)
Paul Duffy, Neptune and Company, Lakewood, United States, Michael Maier Keller, US Forest Service San Juan, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, San Juan, PR, United States, Douglas C Morton, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, United States and David Schimel, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
High-Resolution Modeling Disturbance-Induced Forest Carbon Dynamics with Lidar and Landsat Observations (70609)
Maosheng Zhao1, Chengquan Huang2, George C Hurtt2, Ralph Dubayah2, Justin Fisk2, Ritvik Sahajpal2, Steve Flanagan2, Anu Swatantran2, Wenli Huang2, Hao Tang2, Jarlath ONeil-Dunne3 and Kristofer D Johnson4, (1)University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, United States, (2)University of Maryland, Department of Geographical Sciences, College Park, MD, United States, (3)University of Vermont, Rubenstein School of Environment & Natural Resources, Burlington, VT, United States, (4)USDA Forest Service Northern Research Statiuon, Newtown Square, PA, United States
Spatial and Temporal Trends in terrestrial Ecosystems Net primary Production: A Model-Data Comparison (64596)
Rashid Rafique1, Ghassem Asrar2, Fang Zhao3, Ning Zeng3 and Terrestrial Ecosystem Modeling Team, (1)JGCRI/PNNL, College Park, MD, United States, (2)Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, MD, United States, (3)University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, United States
Developing a generalized allometric equation for aboveground biomass estimation (85835)
James Joseph Balamuta1, Jonathan A Greenberg2, Bo Li3, Albert Man1, Qing Xu1, Zewei Xu1 and GEARS NASA CMS Project, (1)University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, (2)University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Department of Geography and Geographic Information Science, Urbana, IL, United States, (3)University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, United States
Calculating net primary productivity of forest ecosystem with G4M model: case study on South Korea (66924)
Sunyong Sung1, Nicklas Forsell2, Georg Kindermann2 and Dong Kun Lee3, (1)Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), (2)IIASA International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, (3)Seoul National University, Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul, South Korea
What is the value of biomass remote sensing data for blue carbon inventories? (67211)
Kristin B Byrd, USGS Western Regional Offices Menlo Park, Menlo Park, CA, United States, Marc Simard, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, Stephen Crooks, Environmental Science Associates, Sacramento, CA, United States and Lisamarie Windham-Myers, USGS California Water Science Center Menlo Park, Menlo Park, CA, United States
Mangrove Blue Carbon stocks and change estimation from PolInSAR, Lidar and High Resolution Stereo Imagery combined with Forest Cover change mapping (85833)
Temilola Fatoyinbo1, Marc Simard2, David Lagomasino3, Seung-Kuk Lee3, Carl Trettin4, Emanuelle A Feliciano3, Matthew Hansen5, Poulsen John6 and Viviana Zalles7, (1)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (2)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (3)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (4)US Forest Service Cordesville, Cordesville, SC, United States, (5)University of Maryland, Department of Geographical Sciences, College Park, United States, (6)Duke University, Durham, NC, United States, (7)World Resources Institute, Washington, United States
A Carbon Monitoring System Approach to US Coastal Wetland Carbon Fluxes: Progress Towards a Tier II Accounting Method with Uncertainty Quantification  (80143)
Lisamarie Windham-Myers1, James Robert Holmquist2, Brian A Bergamaschi3, Kristin B Byrd1, John Callaway4, Stephen Crooks5, Judith Z Drexler6, Rusty A Feagin7, Matthew C. Ferner8, Meagan Eagle Eagle9, Kevin D Kroeger10, Patrick Megonigal2, James T Morris11, Lisa M Schile12, Marc Simard13, Ariana Sutton-Grier14, John Takekawa15, Tiffany Troxler16, Donald Weller12 and Isa Woo15, (1)USGS Western Regional Offices Menlo Park, Menlo Park, CA, United States, (2)Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, United States, (3)USGS Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, United States, (4)University of San Francisco, Environmental Studies, San Francisco, CA, United States, (5)Environmental Science Associates, Sacramento, CA, United States, (6)USGS California Water Science Center, Sacramento, United States, (7)Texas A&M University College Station, Ecology and Conservation Biology, and Ocean Engineering, College Station, TX, United States, (8)San Francisco Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Tiburon, United States, (9)USGS Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United States, (10)USGS, Woods Hole, United States, (11)University of South Carolina Columbia, Columbia, SC, United States, (12)Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Edgewater, Edgewater, MD, United States, (13)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (14)University of Maryland College Park, College Park, United States, (15)USGS Western Ecological Research Center, Vallejo, CA, United States, (16)Florida International University, Institute of Environment, Sea Level Solutions Center, Miami, United States
Preliminary Study: Application of Off-Axis ICOS to Determine Stable Carbon Isotope in Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (77550)
Youn-Tae Kim1, Jae-Min Lee2, Jeong Hwan Hwang3, Jize Piao3 and Nam C Woo4, (1)Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), (2)Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon, South Korea, (3)Yonsei University, Department of Earth System Science, Seoul, South Korea, (4)Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

See more of: Global Environmental Change