NS44A:
Current Trends in High-Resolution Subsurface Imaging II


Session ID#: 9718

Session Description:
Near surface geophysical imaging has transformed over the last few years. Advances in hardware and software, along with better theoretical modeling and increasingly available and affordable computing power allow for quantitative and high precision interpretation of geophysical data. The most remarkable progress involves work in the near subsurface (e.g. < 10m) and cases where target subsurface volume is clearly delineated (e.g. borehole bounded). Remarkable progress has been observed in certain disciplines, such as biogeophysics, hydrogeophysics, and environmental geophysics, where geophysical imaging allowed monitoring/characterizaion of processes previously not even thought to be possible (e.g. microbial activity, contaminant movement in micro pores). This session aims to discuss the current state of the art in near surface geophysics, explore the limitations and identify the next steps towards quantitative interpretation. Field applications, laboratory experiments and theoretical research efforts are welcome.
Primary Convener:  Dimitrios Ntarlagiannis, Rutgers University, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Newark, United States
Convener:  Xavier Comas, Florida Atlantic University, Geosciences, Boca Raton, FL, United States
Chairs:  Xavier Comas, Florida Atlantic University, Geosciences, Boca Raton, FL, United States and Dimitrios Ntarlagiannis, Rutgers University Newark, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Newark, NJ, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Dimitrios Ntarlagiannis, Rutgers University Newark, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Newark, NJ, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • H - Hydrology
Index Terms:

0699 General or miscellaneous [ELECTROMAGNETICS]
0999 General or miscellaneous [EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Andre Revil, Université de Savoie, ISTerre, CNRS, Le Bourget du Lac, France
Andy Parsekian, University of Wyoming, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Laramie, WY, United States, Chloe M Mawer, Stanford University, Los Altos Hills, CA, United States, Adam Pidlisecky, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada and Rosemary J Knight, Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, United States
Stephen M Moysey, Clemson University, Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson, United States, Adam R Mangel, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States, Blake A Lytle, Clemson University, Department of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson, SC, United States and John Holloway Bradford, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States
Gregory Mount, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Geosciences, Indiana, United States and Xavier Comas, Florida Atlantic University, Geosciences, Boca Raton, FL, United States
Hakan Alp, Istanbul University, Engineering Faculty Department of Geophysical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey
Adrian Flores Orozco1, Milica Velimirovic2, Tiziana Tosco3, Andreas Kemna4, Hans Sapion5, Norbert Klaas6, Rajandrea Sethi3 and Leen Bastiaens7, (1)TU-Vienna, Geodesy and Geoinformation, Vienna, Austria, (2)University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, (3)Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy, (4)University of Bonn, Institute of Geosciences, Geophysics Section, Bonn, Germany, (5)SAPION, Niljen, Belgium, (6)University of Stuttgart, IWS, VEGAS, Stuttgart, Germany, (7)Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Mol, Belgium
Matthew D McClellan1, William J Wright1, Mario J Job1 and Xavier Comas2, (1)Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States, (2)Florida Atlantic University, Geosciences, Boca Raton, FL, United States