B13B-0601
Silicone Tubes – Simple and Effective Tools for Gas Extraction and Monitoring in the Course of Hydrate Dissociation

Monday, 14 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Bettina Strauch, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Potsdam, Germany, Judith Maria Schicks, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany and Martin Zimmer, GFZ Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Abstract:
The in situ dissociation of gas hydrate is prerequisite for the commercial recovery of natural gas from hydrate deposits. We examined different methods such as depressurization, thermal stimulation and distortion of the chemical equilibrium by carbon dioxide sequestration for methane gas production from hydrates within our Large Scale reservoir simulator LARS in a pilot plant scale.

Within this setup, thin-walled (0.8 mm) silicon tubes are utilized for in situ gas capture. They function as membranes for the extraction of methane gas, leaving sediment and brine behind. The gas capture via silicone tube membranes is, due to their robust nature, reliably applicable in remote and rough areas. First tests show that, driven by the transmembrane pressure difference, the methane flux through these membranes is about 1 mL per minute per cm² membrane surface at a reservoir pressure of about 20 MPa. This is in good agreement with values reported in the literature [e.g. 2]. The operation of the membranes as a simple capture tool for the released methane from a hydrate deposit is therefore considered as feasible.

Furthermore, silicone tube membranes are suitable for the quantification of free and dissolved gas volumes. For the monitoring of spatial and temporal gas distribution, LARS has been equipped with several silicone membranes at various locations. They have been utilized to monitor the progress of hydrate formation and decomposition and show that inhomogeneous gas distributions within the reservoir are detectable and terminable. The quantification of carbon dioxide/methane gas ratios during exchange experiments, however, is due to differences in water solubility and permeation rates of the gas species challenging.

The study assesses the capability and limits of silicone tubes as membranes for gas extraction and as a tool to monitor gas distribution and composition in the course of hydrate dissociation experiments.

[1] Merkel, T.C.; Bodnar, V.I.; Nagai, K.; Freeman, B.D.; Pinnau, I. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2000, 38, 415–434.