NH33A-1901
Comparison of Tsunami Deposits Surveyed in 2010 and 2015 From the 2010 Maule Earthquake and Tsunami in South-Central Chile.

Wednesday, 16 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Alexandra C Ruiz1, Breanyn T MacInnes1, Lisa L Ely2, Marco Antonio Cisternas3, Guy R Gelfenbaum4 and Bruce M Richmond4, (1)Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA, United States, (2)Central Washington University, Department of Geological Sciences, Ellensburg, WA, United States, (3)Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso, Escuela se Ciencias del Mar, Valparaiso, Chile, (4)USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento, Sacramento, CA, United States
Abstract:
The February 27, 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake and tsunami that struck south-central Chile altered the coastal landscape, leaving a depositional record at many locations along the coast. Our research is questioning whether tsunami deposits originally described during post-tsunami surveys in La Trinchera, Constitución and Coliumo soon after the event change significantly over time. The deposits initially described in 2010 were revisited 5 years later to determine if taphonomic changes occurred and to assess the long-term preservation potential of deposits with different initial characteristics and settings. We recently made measurements of deposit thickness, grain size, grading, sedimentary structures, incipient soil development and accumulation of organic material. Results indicate that deposit thickness and the maximum inland extent of recognizable deposits had decreased slightly since 2010, while overlying soil development and accumulation of organic matter increased. Few deposits had been altered by bioturbation. We will use the inland extent of the deposits surveyed in 2015 to model a minimum size of the 2010 earthquake and tsunami in GeoClaw. The results will be compared with independent geophysical models of the rupture characteristics. This can be used as a case study that can be applied to earlier paleo-earthquake and tsunami events in which seismic data is sparse or non-existent and the most reliable record is the inundation distance as determined by tsunami deposits. Studying the change of deposits in the geologic record over time can provide key insights into how tsunami deposits are preserved, which is important when working with paleo-deposits that may have been altered since deposition.