PA13B-06
Climate Change Resilience Planning at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site

Monday, 14 December 2015: 14:55
103 (Moscone South)
David W Werth, Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, Aiken, SC, United States
Abstract:
The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) is developing a site sustainability plan for the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina in accordance with Executive Order 13693, which charges each DOE agency with “identifying and addressing projected impacts of climate change” and “calculating the potential cost and risk to mission associated with agency operations”. The plan will comprise i) projections of climate change, ii) surveys of site managers to estimate the effects of climate change on site operations, and iii) a determination of adaptive actions.

Climate change projections for SRS are obtained from multiple sources, including an online repository of downscaled global climate model (GCM) simulations of future climate and downscaled GCM simulations produced at SRNL. Taken together, we have projected data for temperature, precipitation, humidity, and wind – all variables with a strong influence on site operations.

SRNL is working to engage site facility managers and facilitate a “bottom up” approach to climate change resilience planning, where the needs and priorities of stakeholders are addressed throughout the process. We make use of the Vulnerability Assessment Scoring Tool, an Excel-based program designed to accept as input various climate scenarios (‘exposure’), the susceptibility of assets to climate change (‘sensitivity’), and the ability of these assets to cope with climate change (‘adaptive capacity’). These are combined to produce a series of scores that highlight vulnerabilities. Working with site managers, we have selected the most important assets, estimated their expected response to climate change, and prepared a report highlighting the most endangered facilities. Primary risks include increased energy consumption, decreased water availability, increased forest fire danger, natural resource degradation, and compromised outdoor worker safety in a warmer and more humid climate. Results of this study will aid in driving future management decisions and promoting sustainable practices at SRS.