DI43B-04
Causes of 142Nd Variation in Earth

Thursday, 17 December 2015: 14:25
303 (Moscone South)
Maud Boyet, CNRS, Clermont-Ferrand, Paris Cedex 16, France; University Blaise Pascal Clermont-Ferrand II, Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, Clermont-Ferrand, France
Abstract:
Variability of the 142Nd/144Nd ratio can reflect Sm/Nd fractionation during the lifetime of 146Sm, i.e. the first 500 Ma of Solar System history1 and nucleosynthetic heterogeneity inherited from the solar nebula. Deciphering the message carried by 142Nd variability requires a detailed examination of the data for Earth and meteorites. The elevated 142Nd/144Nd in terrestrial samples relative to average chondrites suggests that all terrestrial rocks sampled by volcanism over the Earth’s history come from a geochemical reservoir characterized by a superchondritic Sm/Nd ratio. The chemical compliment to this reservoir, however, has never been seen, so it either was lost during Earth’s accretion2,3, or is preserved in a deep hidden reservoir 1,4. These models are based on a comparison of Earth rocks and O-chondrites because they do not show any variation in stable Sm and Nd isotopic composition compared to Earth6-8. The first analyzed E-chondrites with terrestrial 142Nd/144Nd showed 144Sm excesses that reflect an excess p-process contribution. Although 142Nd is mainly produced by s-process, there is a direct p-process component estimated to be lower than 4 %.

We will present new Sm and Nd isotopic data on meteoritic materials. CAIs show deficits in both r- and p-process isotopes that would lead to elevated 142Nd, yet the bulk C-chondrites in which they are contained show excesses in r-process isotopes and hence 142Nd/144Nd lower than terrestrial. The new E-chondrites data do not confirm the 142Nd-144Sm correlation observed in bulk chondrites In light of these results and using 146Sm-142Nd isochrons for constraining the bulk 142Nd/144Nd ratio of planetary bodies, we will discuss the 142Nd signature of terrestrial samples (from Hadean to present).

1Boyet & Carlson, Science 2005; 2O’Neill & Palme, Phil. Trans. R. Soc 2008; 3Caro et al. Nature 2008; 4Andreasen et al. EPSL 2008; 6Andreasen & Sharma, Science 2006; 7Carlson et al., Science 2007; 8Gannoun et al. PNAS 2011.