Beyond Roughness: Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Topographic "Structure" on Venus and Elsewhere in the Solar System

Abstract:

What numbers "capture" topography? If stationary, white, and Gaussian: mean and variance. But "whiteness" is strong; we are led to a "baseline" over which to compute means and variances. We then have subscribed to topography as a correlated process, and to the estimation (noisy, afftected by edge effects) of the parameters of a spatial or spectral covariance function. What if the covariance function or the point process itself aren't Gaussian? What if the region under study isn't regularly shaped or sampled? How can results from differently sized patches be compared robustly? We present a spectral-domain "Whittle" maximum-likelihood procedure that circumvents these difficulties and answers the above questions. The key is the Matern form, whose parameters (variance, range, differentiability) define the shape of the covariance function (Gaussian, exponential, ..., are all special cases). We treat edge effects in simulation and in estimation. Data tapering allows for the irregular regions. We determine the estimation variance of all parameters. And the "best" estimate may not be "good enough": we test whether the "model" itself warrants rejection. We illustrate our methodology on geologically mapped patches of Venus. Surprisingly few numbers capture planetary topography. We derive them, with uncertainty bounds, we simulate "new" realizations of patches that look to the geologists exactly as if they were derived from similar processes. Our approach holds in 1, 2, and 3 spatial dimensions, and generalizes to multiple variables, e.g. when topography and gravity are being considered jointly (perhaps linked by flexural rigidity, erosion, or other surface and sub-surface modifying processes). Our results have widespread implications for the study of planetary topography in the Solar System, and are interpreted in the light of trying to derive "process" from "parameters", the end goal to assign likely formation histories for the patches under consideration. Our results should also be relevant for whomever needed to perform spatial interpolation or out-of-sample extension (e.g. kriging), machine learning and feature detection, on geological data. We present procedural details but focus on high-level results that have real-world implications for the study of Venus, Earth, other planets, and moons.