H41G-1413
PARADIGM SHIFT IN TRANSBOUNDARY WATER MANAGEMENT POLICY: LINKING WATER ENVIRONMENT ENERGY AND FOOD (WEEF) TO CATCHMENT HYDROPOLITICS – NEEDS, SCOPE AND BENEFITS

Thursday, 17 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Subash RAI, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India, Aaron Wolf, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States, Nayan Sharma, Professor, Water Resources Development and Management, Roorkee, India and Harinarayan Tiwari, Research Scholar, Water Resources Development and Management, Roorkee, India
Abstract:
The incessant use of water due to rapid growth of population, enhanced agricultural and industrial activities, degraded environment and ecology will in the coming decades constrain the socioeconomic development of humans. To add on to the precarious situation, political boundaries rarely embrace hydrological boundaries of lakes, rivers, aquifers etc. Hydropolitics relate to the ability of geopolitical institutions to manage shared water resources in a politically sustainable manner, i.e., without tensions or conflict between political entities. Riparian hydropolitics caters to differing objectives, needs and requirements of states making it difficult to administer the catchment. The diverse riparian objectives can be merged to form a holistic catchment objective of sustainable water resources development and management.

It can be proposed to make a paradigm shift in the present–day transboundary water policy from riparian hydropolitics (in which the focal point of water resources use is hinged on state's need) to catchment hydropolitics (in which the interest of the basin inhabitants are accorded primacy holistically over state interests) and specifically wherein the water, environment, energy and food (WEEF) demands of the catchment are a priority and not of the states in particular. The demands of the basin pertaining to water, food and energy have to be fulfilled, keeping the environment and ecology healthy in a cooperative political framework; the need for which is overwhelming. In the present scenario, the policy for water resources development of a basin is segmented into independent uncoordinated parts controlled by various riparians; whereas in catchment hydropolitics the whole basin should be considered as a unit. The riparians should compromise a part of national interest and work in collaboration on a joint objective which works on the principle of the whole as against the part. Catchment hydropolitics may find greater interest in the more than 250 international transboundary river basins. The technical and financial capabilities of the states can be utilized for the socio-economic development as well as ecological conservation of the catchment. This proposed approach has the potential to help in generating cooperation along as well as beyond water, thereby promote benefit sharing by all.