SH54A-01
Definitions of Reconnection Revisited: Distinction Between Magnetic Reconnection and Plasma Reconnection

Friday, 18 December 2015: 16:00
2011 (Moscone West)
Vytenis M Vasyliunas, Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Göttingen, Germany; University of Massachusetts Lowell, Space Science Laboratory, Lowell, MA, United States
Abstract:
The term "magnetic reconnection" has been used with several different meanings, and sometimes (particularly in discussions of observations) it is not clear which one of them (if any) is meant. Most common is a more or less literal definition of "cutting" and "reconnecting" two magnetic field lines (often illustrated by a sketch of field lines in two dimensions, or a perspective drawing of isolated spaghetti-like flux tubes); this concept can be formulated more precisely in terms of plasma flow across (or, equivalently, electric field in) a bounding surface (separatrix) between topologically distinct magnetic fields. The so-called "generalized reconnection" invokes only deviations from ideal MHD in a localized region; a more precise formulation is by integrals of the electric field along magnetic field lines. These two definitions can be related to two different physical processes, which I call magnetic reconnection and plasma reconnection, respectively. Magnetic reconnection involves field lines that change from one topological class to another (e.g., between open and closed). Its occurrence, requiring the presence of singular magnetic null points, can be identified (at least in principle, conceptually) from the magnetic field alone. When representing magnetic reconnection graphically, it is important to show all the singular points explicitly and to keep in mind that field lines are a continuum: between any two field lines, there is always another field line (even arbitrarily close to the singular points). Plasma reconnection involves plasma flow in which plasma elements initially located on a single field line do not remain on a field line, and this may occur without any changes in the topology or other properties of the magnetic field. To understand either one, the process must be visualized always in three dimensions and without special symmetries. Prototype of magnetic reconnection is the well-known open-magnetosphere model of Dungey (1961). Prototype of plasma reconnection, earlier still but never called by that name: the recognition by Gold (1959) that plasma flow in the magnetosphere is decoupled from the highly conducting terrestrial interior as a result of poorly conducting atmosphere. Defining reconnection on closed field lines (e.g., plasmoid formation) remains problematic.