A23P-04
Atmospheric Verification of Point Source Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions

Tuesday, 15 December 2015: 14:25
3001 (Moscone West)
Jocelyn C Turnbull1,2, Elizabeth D. Keller2, Margaret W Norris3, Rachael Wiltshire2, W Troy Baisden4, Gordon W Brailsford5 and Tony Bromley5, (1)GNS Science / Rafter Radiocarbon, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, (2)GNS Science, National Isotope Centre, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, (3)GNS Science-Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Ltd, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, (4)Institute Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, (5)NIWA National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
Abstract:
Large point sources (electricity generation and large-scale industry) make up roughly one third of all fossil fuel CO2 (CO2ff) emissions. Currently, these emissions are determined from self-reported inventory data, and sometimes from smokestack emissions monitoring, and the uncertainty in emissions from individual power plants is about 20%. We examine the utility of atmospheric 14C measurements combined with atmospheric transport modelling as a tool for independently quantifying point source CO2ff emissions, to both improve the accuracy of the reported emissions and for verification as we move towards a regulatory environment.

We use the Kapuni Gas Treatment Facility as a test case. It is located in rural New Zealand with no other significant fossil fuel CO2 sources nearby, and emits CO2ff at ~0.1 Tg carbon per year. We use several different sampling methods to determine the 14C and hence the CO2ff content downwind of the emission source: grab flask samples of whole air; absorption of CO2 into sodium hydroxide integrated over many hours; and plant material which faithfully records the 14C content of assimilated CO2. We use a plume dispersion model to compare the reported emissions with our observed CO2ff mole fractions. We show that the short-term variability in plume dispersion makes it difficult to interpret the grab flask sample results, whereas the variability is averaged out in the integrated samples and we obtain excellent agreement between the reported and observed emissions, indicating that the 14C method can reliably be used to evaluated point source emissions.