GC14B-04
A Paleoecological View of the Anthropocene in Tropical South America

Monday, 14 December 2015: 16:50
3003 (Moscone West)
Mark B Bush, Florida Institute of Technology, Department of Biological Sciences, Melbourne, FL, United States, Crystal H McMichael, University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity & Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), Amsterdam, Netherlands and Dolores R Piperno, National Museum of Natural History National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution,, Anthropology, Washington,, DC, United States
Abstract:
Many potential events could define the onset of the Anthropocene in the Neotropics. The first effects caused by humans included the final extinction of megafauna around 10,000 years ago, and changes in fire frequency, particularly after about 8000 years ago. The first agriculture (squash) is evident in northwestern regions at 9000 BP, and in the Amazon Basin maize is cultivated by 6300 BP. But these events have not been widely documented on the continent and if some chronological uniformity is sought as a guide to defining the onset of the Anthropocene, they would fail that test.

Coming forward through time, increasing societal complexity is evident beginning about 3000 BP in both the Amazon and the Andes, but again the development was patchy. Some archaeologists are arguing that between c. 2000 BP and 500 BP the Amazon Basin became a manufactured landscape. While major river corridors were very likely influenced by human populations, the level of use in the great interfluvial areas (c. 90% of Amazonia) remains a matter of debate. The empirical data that exist for human presence in these areas point to sparse occupation, both in space and time, and the assertion that most of prehistoric Amazonia was manipulated by humans is unsupported. Following European contact, indigenous populations were reduced probably 90-95% within 200 years, which interrupted the cultural trajectory of the Neotropics.

The next possible contender for the local onset of the Anthropocene was the Rubber Boom (1879-1912). The Rubber Boom greatly increased human populations along many of the Amazon’s major rivers and tributaries. Hunting and deforestation picked up pace, and the growing presence of steamships allowed exportation of a wide range of Amazonian products beyond rubber, e.g. plumes, timber, and turtle oil. In addition to these local effects, the global effects that came with increased fossil fuel use and industrialization, would also have influenced all of South America. Even so, the influence of the Rubber Boom would have been strongest in the Amazon Basin and far milder in the Andes or along the Pacific coastline.

In the 1950s-1970s the green revolutions and fossil-fuel based agriculture caused an increase in global NOx. Increased NOx deposition and the appearance of plastics may be defining markers of the Anthropocene in South America.