S42C-04
International Aftershock Forecasting: Lessons from the Gorkha Earthquake

Thursday, 17 December 2015: 11:05
305 (Moscone South)
Andrew Jay Michael1, Michael L Blanpied2, Shailaja R Brady3, Nicholas van der Elst4, Jeanne Hardebeck1, Gari C Mayberry3, Morgan T Page4, Greg M Smoczyk5 and Anne M Wein6, (1)USGS, Menlo Park, CA, United States, (2)USGS Headquarters, Reston, VA, United States, (3)US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, United States, (4)USGS Earthquake Science Center, Pasadena, CA, United States, (5)USGS National Earthquake Information Center Golden, Golden, CO, United States, (6)U. S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Menlo Park, CA, United States
Abstract:
Following the M7.8 Gorhka, Nepal, earthquake of April 25, 2015 the USGS issued a series of aftershock forecasts. The initial impetus for these forecasts was a request from the USAID Office of US Foreign Disaster Assistance to support their Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART) which coordinated US Government disaster response, including search and rescue, with the Government of Nepal. Because of the possible utility of the forecasts to people in the region and other response teams, the USGS released these forecasts publicly through the USGS Earthquake Program web site. The initial forecast used the Reasenberg and Jones (Science, 1989) model with generic parameters developed for active deep continental regions based on the Garcia et al. (BSSA, 2012) tectonic regionalization. These were then updated to reflect a lower productivity and higher decay rate based on the observed aftershocks, although relying on teleseismic observations, with a high magnitude-of-completeness, limited the amount of data. After the 12 May M7.3 aftershock, the forecasts used an Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence model to better characterize the multiple sources of earthquake clustering. This model provided better estimates of aftershock uncertainty. These forecast messages were crafted based on lessons learned from the Christchurch earthquake along with input from the U.S. Embassy staff in Kathmandu. Challenges included how to balance simple messaging with forecasts over a variety of time periods (week, month, and year), whether to characterize probabilities with words such as those suggested by the IPCC (IPCC, 2010), how to word the messages in a way that would translate accurately into Nepali and not alarm the public, and how to present the probabilities of unlikely but possible large and potentially damaging aftershocks, such as the M7.3 event, which had an estimated probability of only 1-in-200 for the week in which it occurred.