H13O-03
Hydrologic Connectivity Estimated throughout the Nation’s River Corridors

Monday, 14 December 2015: 14:10
3024 (Moscone West)
Jud W Harvey, USGS, Reston, VA, United States and Jesus D Gomez-Velez, US Geological Survey, Herndon, VA, United States
Abstract:
Hydrologic connectivity is a key concept that integrates longitudinal transport in rivers with vertical and lateral exchanges between rivers and hyporheic zones, riparian wetlands, floodplains, and ponded aquatic ecosystems. Desirable levels of connectivity are thought to be associated with rivers that are well-connected longitudinally while also being well connected vertically and laterally with marginal waters where carbon and nutrients are efficiently transformed, and where aquatic organisms feed, or are reared, or take refuge during floods. But what is the proper balance between longitudinal and vertical and lateral connectivity? We took a step towards quantifying hydrologic connectivity using the model NEXSS (Gomez-Velez and Harvey, 2014, GRL) applied throughout the nation’s rivers. NEXSS simulates vertical and lateral connectivity and compares it with longitudinal transport along the river’s main axis. It uses as inputs measured network topology for first to eighth order channels, river hydraulic geometry, sediment grain size, bedform types and sizes, estimated hydraulic conductivity of sediments, and estimates of reaction rates such as denitrification. Results indicate that hyporheic flow is large enough to exchange a river’s entire volume many times within a river network, which increases biogeochemical opportunities for nutrient processing and attenuation of contaminants. Also, the analysis demonstrated why and where (i.e., in which physiographic regions of the nation) are hyporheic flow and solute reactions the greatest. The cumulative influence of hydrologic connectivity on water quality is expressed by a dimensionless index of reaction significance. Our quantification of hydrologic connectivity adds a physical basis that supports water quality modeling, and also supports scientifically based prioritization of management actions (e.g. stream restoration) and may support other types of actions (e.g. legislative actions) to help conserve healthy functional rivers with proper levels of stream metabolism and diverse food webs. The NEXSS model will be modified to account for variable flow (baseflow to bankfull) and to account for exchange that occurs with overbank flooding of riparian wetlands and floodplains.