H33C-1612
Scaling Hydrologic Exchange Flows and Biogeochemical Reactions from Bedforms to Basins

Wednesday, 16 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Jud W Harvey, USGS Headquarters, Reston, VA, United States and Jesus D Gomez-Velez, US Geological Survey, Herndon, VA, United States
Abstract:
River water moves in and out of the main channel along pathways that are perpendicular to the channel’s main axis that flow across or beneath the ground surface. These hydrologic exchange flows (HEFs) are difficult to measure, yet no less important than a river’s downstream flow, or exchanges with the atmosphere and deeper groundwater (Harvey and Gooseff, 2015, WRR). There are very few comprehensive investigations of exchange fluxes to understand patterns with river size and relative importance of specific types of exchanges. We used the physically based model NEXSS to simulate multiple scales of hyporheic flow and their cumulative effects on solute reaction in large basins (on the order of Chesapeake Bay basin or larger). Our goal was to explain where and when particular types of hyporheic flow are important in enhancing key biogeochemical reactions, such as organic carbon respiration and denitrification. Results demonstrate that hyporheic flux (expressed per unit area of streambed) varies surprisingly little across the continuum of first-order streams to eighth-order rivers, and vertical exchange beneath small bedforms dominates in comparison with lateral flow beneath gravel bars and meanders. Also, the river’s entire volume is exchanged many times with hyporheic flow within a basin, and the turnover length (after one entire river volume is exchanged) is strongly influenced by hydrogeomorphic differences between physiographic regions as well as by river size. The cumulative effects on biogeochemical reactions were assessed using a the reaction significance factor, RSF, which computes the cumulative potential for hyporheic reactions using a dimensionless index that balances reaction progress in a single hyporheic flow path against overall processing efficiency of river turnover through hyporheic flow paths of that type. Reaction significance appears to be strongly dominated by hydrologic factors rather than biogeochemical factors, and seems to be dominated by vertical exchange beneath small bedforms throughout river networks. Future implementations of NEXSS will expand the model to consider flow variation and to consider HEFs beyond hyporheic flow to include exchange with marginal surface waters such as riparian wetlands, floodplains, and ponded water.