H53E-1698
Characterization of return flow pathways during flood irrigation

Friday, 18 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Niels Claes1, Ginger B Paige2, Andrew Parsekian2, Beatrice Louise Gordon3 and Scott N Miller4, (1)UWYO, ESM, Laramie, WY, United States, (2)University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States, (3)University of Wyoming, Ecosystem Science and Management, Laramie, WY, United States, (4)Univ Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States
Abstract:
With a decline in water resources available for private consumption and irrigation, the importance of sustainable water management practices is increasing. Local management decisions, based on models may affect the availability of water both locally and downstream, causing a ripple effect. It is therefore important that the models that these local management decisions are based on, accurately quantify local hydrological processes and the timescales at which they happen. We are focusing on return flow from flood irrigation, which can occur via different pathways back to the streams: overland flow, near-surface return flow and return flow via pathways below the vadose zone. The question addressed is how these different pathways each contribute to the total amount of return flow and the dynamics behind them. We used time-lapse ERT measurements in combination with an ensemble of ERT and seismic lines to answer this question via (1) capturing the process of gradual fragmentation of aqueous environments in the vadose zone during drying stages at field scale; (2) characterization of the formation of preferential flow paths from infiltrating wetting fronts during wetting cycles at field scale. The time-lapse ERT provides the possibility to capture the dynamic processes involved during the occurrence of finger flow or macro-pores when an intensive wetting period during flood irrigation occurs. It elucidates the dynamics of retention in the vadose zone during drying and wetting periods at field scale. This method provides thereby a link to upscale from laboratory experiments to field scale and watershed scale for finger flow and preferential flow paths and illustrates the hysteresis behavior at field scale.