B21F-0538
Will Interannual Climatic Variability Prevent Any CO2-driven Stimulation of Grassland Biomass?

Tuesday, 15 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Mark Joseph Hovenden, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
Abstract:
The future productivity of this world depends upon how ecosystems respond to the changing environment. It is generally expected that the increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere should stimulation biomass production, especially in semi-arid or seasonally dry environments. However, many experiments in grassland systems have shown clearly that the effect of elevated CO2 (eCO2) on biomass production varies substantially among years, with the eCO2 effect varying from strongly positive to strongly negative across years. Recently, we demonstrated that the eCO2 effect on biomass in one such highly-variable system (the TasFACE experiment) can be explained very accurately by the seasonal distribution of rainfall, with more rainfall in summer leading to eCO2 stimulation of biomass and more rainfall in spring or autumn reducing the eCO2 effect. Thus, the overall impact of eCO2 on net primary productivity in such systems depends upon the seasonal rainfall balance, not the total amount that falls. Here, we use the relationship derived from the TasFACE experiment to simulate biomass production and the eCO2 effect using both historical and projected future rainfall patterns. We also compare the projections from this simple, experimentally-derived empirical relationship with those from a more complex, mechanistic ecosystem model that accurately predicts current biomass production in this system. Both sets of projections show that both historical and future rainfall variability substantially influence the simulated eCO2 effect, but the mechanistic model fails to predict the negative effects of eCO2 on biomass production. It is probable that linkages between rainfall and soil nitrogen availability are not sufficiently captured in the mechanistic model and that this influences the projections of ecosystem productivity. Such effects need to be captured in mechanistic models if we are to improve our ability to predict and model future land-atmosphere feedbacks.