P43F-02
Regolith Formation Rates and Evolution from the Diviner Lunar Radiometer

Thursday, 17 December 2015: 13:55
2007 (Moscone West)
Paul Ottinger Hayne1, Rebecca R Ghent2, Joshua L Bandfield3, Ashwin R Vasavada1, Jean-Pierre Williams4, Matthew A Siegler5, Paul G Lucey6, Benjamin T Greenhagen7, Catherine M Elder1, David A Paige4 and Diviner Lunar Radiometer Science Team, (1)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)University of Toronto, Earth Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada, (3)Space Science Institute, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (5)Jet Propulsion Lab, Pasadena, CA, United States, (6)Hawaii Inst Geophys & Planetol, Honolulu, HI, United States, (7)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States
Abstract:
Fragmentation and overturn of lunar surface materials produces a layer of regolith, which increases in thickness through time. Experiments on the lunar surface during the Apollo era, combined with remote sensing, found that the upper 10's of cm of regolith exhibit a rapid increase in density and thermal conductivity with depth. This is interpreted to be the signature of impact gardening, which operates most rapidly in the uppermost layers. Gravity data from the GRAIL mission showed that impacts have also extensively fractured the deeper crust. The breakdown and mixing of crustal materials is therefore a central process to lunar evolution and must be understood in order to interpret compositional information from remote sensing and sample analysis. Recently, thermal infrared data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Diviner radiometer were used to provide the first remote observational constraints on the rate of ejecta breakdown around craters < 1 Ga (Ghent et al., 2014). Here, we use nighttime regolith temperatures derived from Diviner data to constrain regolith thermal inertia, thickness, and spatial variability. Applied to models, these new data help improve understanding of regolith formation on a variety of geologic units. We will also discuss several anomalous features that merit further investigation.
Reference: Ghent, R. R., Hayne, P. O., Bandfield, J. L., Campbell, B. A., Allen, C. C., Carter, L. M., & Paige, D. A. (2014). Constraints on the recent rate of lunar ejecta breakdown and implications for crater ages. Geology, 42(12), 1059-1062.