P43A-2101
Modeling the Tidal Response of Io: Coupled Viscoelastic Dissipation and Melt Distribution

Thursday, 17 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Carver Jay Bierson, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States and Francis Nimmo, University of California-Santa Cruz, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Santa Cruz, CA, United States
Abstract:
Astronomical observations [1] and heat flow measurements [2] of Io have provided a constraint on Io’s tidal dissipation rate (k2/Q). Induction measurements have been used to infer a partially molten region with 20% melt [3]. Here we investigate Io’s tidal response using these constraints and a model in which tidal heating and melt distribution are coupled.

Previous tidal models of Io have assumed a Maxwellian rheology [4, 5]. The Maxwell model is highly idealized which leads to estimates of Io’s mantle viscosity on order 1013 − 1016 Pa·s, much smaller than typical values for partially-molten rocks.

Here we build on the work of [6], with two significant differences. First, we couple tidal heating to the melt distribution model of [6], using the approach developed in [7]. Second, rather than a Maxwell rheology we adopt the more realistic Andrade model [8]. The response of partially-molten rocks under periodic and steady-state (viscous) conditions is modeled using the experimental results of [8] and [9], respectively.

Initial results yield Io mantle viscosities in excess of 1017Pa·s, compatible with experimental data, and melt fractions of up to 20%, consistent with the induction observations [3].

[1] V. Lainey et al., Nature 459.7249 (2009), pp. 957–959. [2] W. B. Moore et al., Io After Galileo: A New View of Jupiter’s Volcanic Moon. 2007, pp. 89–108. [3] K. Khurana et al., Science 332.June (2011). [4] W. B. Moore., Journal of Geophysical Research 108 (2003), pp. 1–6. [5] R. H. Tyler et al., The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 218.2 (2015), p. 22. [6] W. B. Moore., Icarus 154 (2001), pp. 548– 550. [7] J. H. Roberts and F. Nimmo., Icarus 194.2 (2008), pp. 675–689. [8] I. Jackson et al., Journal of Geophysical Research B: Solid Earth 109.6 (2004), pp. 1–17. [9] S. Mei et al., Earth and Planetary Science Letters 201 (2002), pp. 491–507.