Using SfM Photogrammetry from a Manned-aircraft to Settle Debate on the Heights of the Five Tallest Mountains in the US Arctic

Abstract:

Due to discrepancies on the USGS topographic maps made in the late 1950s, the height of the tallest peaks in the US Arctic has remained uncertain -- until now. The five tallest peaks here are located within 40 km of each other in the eastern Brooks Range of Alaska within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The 1:250,000 scale map lists Mt Isto as tallest at 9050’, but the 1:63,360 scale map lists it at 8975’. These values bracket the elevation of Mt Chamberlin, which is listed as 9020’ on both maps, creating the primary uncertainty. We used fodar™, an airborne photogrammetric method utilizing Structure-from-Motion (SfM) algorithms, to measure the heights of these peaks and validated these measurements using survey-grade GPS and airborne lidar. The GPS and fodar measurements of Mt Isto and Mt Chamberlin agree to within centimeters, and show that both mountains are under 9000’ and that one of them is actually the third tallest. We have mapped each of the five peaks between 4 and 6 times over the past 7 years using either lidar or fodar, with a final measurement uncertainty of less than +/- 30 cm, noting a gradual loss of elevation over time on most of them, caused by ablation of glacier-capped and snow-corniced peaks. When the USGS maps were made, it is therefore conceivable that one or more of these mountains were over 9000’ but have since lowered due to ice loss. Analysis of the SfM data shows that all five peaks likely have less than 10 meters of ice remaining on them and, at current loss rates, rock may be exposed on some of them within the next 10 years. The difference in height between the 4^th and 5^th tallest peaks varied temporally between 1 and 3 m, suggesting that their order may yet change before rock is exposed there. The measured heights of these five peaks will be revealed in the presentation. Based on the correspondence between and within data sets, we also conclude that our SfM photogrammetry is as accurate and more precise than our lidar in the measurement of these mountains and offers many other advantages. In particular, the photogrammetric hardware is 10x less expensive than lidar of similar capability, and unlike lidar the SfM measurements also create a perfectly co-registered orthoimage which is useful in interpretation of topographic change.

Figure. 3D visualization of Mt Isto fodar data with GPS validation data overlain.