DI33A-2607
Inner Core Structure Behind the PKP Core Phase Triplication

Wednesday, 16 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Hanneke Paulssen1, Nienke Blom2, Arwen Fedora Deuss2 and Lauren Waszek3, (1)Utrecht University, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands, (2)Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584, Netherlands, (3)University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Abstract:
Despite its small size, the Earth's inner core plays an important role in the Earth's dynamics. Because it is slowly growing, its structure – and the variation thereof with depth – may reveal important clues about the history of the core, its convection and the resulting geodynamo. Learning more about this structure has been a prime effort in the past decades, leading to discoveries about anisotropy, hemispheres and heterogeneity in the inner core in general. In terms of detailed structure, mainly seismic body waves have contributed to these advances. However, at depths between ~100–200 km, the seismic structure is relatively poorly known. This is a result of the PKP core phase triplication and the existence of strong precursors to PKP phases, whose simultaneous arrival hinders the measurement of inner core waves PKIKP at epicentral distances between roughly 143–148°. As a consequence, the interpretation of deeper structure also remains difficult. To overcome these issues, we stack seismograms in slowness and time, separating PKP and PKIKP phases which arrive simultaneously, but with different slowness. We apply this method to study the inner core's Western hemisphere between South and Central America using paths travelling in the quasi-polar direction between epicentral distances of 140–150°. This enables us to measure PKiKP-PKIKP differential travel times up to greater epicentral distance than has previously been done. The resulting differential travel time residuals increase with epicentral distance, indicating a marked increase in seismic velocity with depth compared to reference model AK135 for the studied polar paths. Assuming a homogeneous outer core, these findings can be explained by either (i) inner core heterogeneity due to an increase in isotropic velocity, or (ii) increase in anisotropy over the studied depth range. Our current data set cannot distinguish between the two hypotheses, but in light of previous work we prefer the latter interpretation.