Seeking GUTH, the Grand Unified Theory of Hillslopes: Linking Weathering, Erosion and Landscapes

Wednesday, 16 December 2015: 16:00
2003 (Moscone West)
Suzanne P Anderson1, William E Dietrich2, Daniella Rempe2, Nicole West3, Susan L Brantley4, Allan R Bacon5, Heather L Buss6, Beth Fisher7, Brady A Flinchum8, W Steven Holbrook8, Peter Z Klos9, Matthias Leopold10, Seulgi Moon11, Travis Nielson12, Jon D Pelletier13 and Neil Terry14, (1)University of Colorado at Boulder, INSTAAR and Geography, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, (3)Georgia Institute of Technology Main Campus, Atlanta, GA, United States, (4)Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Penn State, Univ. Pk, PA, United States, (5)University of Florida, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Ft Walton Beach, FL, United States, (6)University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, (7)University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, United States, (8)University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States, (9)University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States, (10)University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia, (11)University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (12)Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States, (13)University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, (14)Rutgers University-Newark, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Newark, NJ, United States
Critical zone (CZ) architecture—the spatial distribution of soil and weathered bedrock within a landscape—reflects the integrated effects of weathering and erosion. A goal is to predict subsurface CZ architecture from surface observations: such a Grand Unified Theory of Hillslopes (GUTH) would incorporate processes that transport water, solutes and sediment on hillslopes under topographic, tectonic, and climatic drivers. CZ architecture itself exerts strong control on fluxes. Therefore, feedbacks between CZ structure and internal processes play a role in CZ evolution. Development of GUTH is limited by a paucity of data that reveal the full CZ architecture and its spatial distribution, although efforts by the CZ Observatory community and others have advanced our understanding.

Subsurface properties can be documented by direct sampling of soil, weathered rock, and fresh rock. Samples allow analysis of chemical and physical properties but generally lack spatial coverage. Geophysical techniques, such as seismic refraction, yield spatially distributed data, but are rarely correlated to sample-based data. Combining distributed and sample data, especially for deep CZ samples, presents an opportunity to advance understanding.

Thermal, biological, and hydrological surface drivers tend to decline in intensity with depth. A significant challenge is therefore identifying and modeling processes that extend weathering downward under declining gradients. Significant gaps exist in models of water flux and chemistry in variably fractured media, of biotic processes (physical and chemical), and of fracture generation. Topographic stress and groundwater dynamics have been advanced as important drivers of CZ evolution. In both cases, the full hillslope must be considered, including dynamics of the lower boundary condition, to model development of a weathered profile. We therefore highlight the need for data and models that consider the hillslope from divide to channel, from surface to fresh rock.