G51A-1064
Operational Data Quality Assessment of the Combined PBO, TLALOCNet and COCONet Real-Time GNSS Networks

Friday, 18 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Kathleen Marian Hodgkinson1, David Mencin2, Otina Fox1, Christian P Walls3, Doerte Mann4, Frederick Blume5, Henry T Berglund2, David Phillips1, Charles M Meertens2 and Glen S Mattioli2, (1)UNAVCO, Inc., Boulder, CO, United States, (2)UNAVCO, Inc. Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)UNAVCO, Inc. Forestville, Forestville, CA, United States, (4)UNAVCO, Forestville, CA, United States, (5)UNAVCO, Boulder, CO, United States
Abstract:
The GAGE facility, managed by UNAVCO, currently operates a network of ~460, real-time, high-rate GNSS stations (RT-GNSS). The majority of these RT stations are part of the Earthscope PBO network, which spans the western US Pacific North-American plate boundary. Approximately 50 are distributed throughout the Mexico and Caribbean region funded by the TLALOCNet and COCONet projects. The entire network is processed in real-time at UNAVCO using Precise Point Positioning (PPP). The real-time streams are freely available to all and user demand has grown almost exponentially since 2010. Data usage is multidisciplinary, including tectonic and volcanic deformation studies, meteorological applications, atmospheric science research in addition to use by national, state and commercial entities. 21 RT-GNSS sites in California now include 200-sps accelerometers for the development of Earthquake Early Warning systems. All categories of users of real-time streams have similar requirements, reliable, low-latency, high-rate, and complete data sets.

To meet these requirements, UNAVCO tracks the latency and completeness of the incoming raw observations and also is developing tools to monitor the quality of the processed data streams. UNAVCO is currently assessing the precision, accuracy and latency of solutions from various PPP software packages. Also under review are the data formats UNAVCO distributes; for example, the PPP solutions are currently distributed in NMEA format, but other formats such as SEED or GeoJSON may be preferred by different user groups to achieve specific mission objectives. In this presentation we will share our experiences of the challenges involved in the data operations of a continental-scale, multi-project, real-time GNSS network, summarize the network’s performance in terms of latency and completeness, and present the comparisons of PPP solutions using different PPP processing techniques.