EP32A-03
Power of Streams and Power of Management: How Community and Fluvial Science Work Together for Massachusetts Rivers
Wednesday, 16 December 2015: 10:50
2005 (Moscone West)
Christine E. Hatch1, Stephen B Mabee2, Noah B Slovin1, Eve Vogel1, John D Gartner1, Nicole Gillett1 and Benjamin P Warner1, (1)University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Geosciences, Amherst, MA, United States, (2)University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States
Abstract:
In the Northeastern U.S., the most costly damages from intense storm events were impacts to road–stream crossings. In steep post-glacial terrain, erosion by floodwater and entrained sediment is the largest destructive force during intense storms, and the most likely driver of major morphological changes to riverbanks and channels. Steam power analysis is a tool that can successfully quantify floodwater energy that caused damage afterward, however, prediction of which reaches or watersheds may experience future impacts remains uncertain. We must better determine how states with thousands of river miles may better prioritize flood mitigation studies, crossing replacements, or other infrastructure upgrades for future flood resilience within resource constraints. This challenged us to develop a statewide–scale scientific method for screening waterways and translating the results into effective policies for river corridor management. Here we present a method based on stream power analysis using widely–available 10–m DEMs and stream flow data to identify locations with extreme high or low stream power values (i.e., >300 W⁄m2 or <60 W⁄m2) or abrupt changes in these values. We used this information to identify potential areas of erosion or deposition in the Deerfield River watershed in Massachusetts and Vermont, then compared it to areas where damage occurred during Tropical Storm Irene. We show that areas of increasing (with respect to distance downstream) and high stream power are prone to landslides, bank failures, and other pulse sediment inputs in flood events. These are also the focal points of wood input to rivers, which combined with increased sediment load, makes culverts in these reaches especially prone to failure. Integration of this information into state databases allows communities to prioritize and make land–use decisions that are informed by the fluvial geomorphic workings of the larger watershed, but that have powerful local implications. Outreach and educational programs focused on stream power and fluvial systems for river practitioners and politicians at all levels align communities’ attitudes about their rivers and result in ecologically sound, more flood resilient policies and practices.