GC43B-1204
Evolution of rainfall and temperature trend and variability in Burkina Faso: Analysis of meteorological data and farmers’ perception
Thursday, 17 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Yameogo Bindayaoba Thomas, West African Science Service Center on Climate Change and Adapted land use (WASCAL), Economics of climate change, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Abstract:
Farmers in Burkina Faso are among the most exposed to climate change/ climate variability, as their livelihoods are greatly linked to climate hazards. Rainfall and in some extent temperature are among the inputs farmers use to take decisions in their farming activities. A better understanding of factors that shape farmers’ perceptions of climate change and decision to adapt farming practices is needed to take appropriate measures. In the current study farmers’ perception of climate change and climate variability- specifically, changes in rainfall and temperature- were compared to historical recorded climate data. Primary data was collected through village focus-group surveys and household surveys. Nine Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were conducted in the study areas’ villages; 450 households were also selected randomly from three locations and sampled out through a multi-stage sampling procedure. Secondary data on the historical precipitation and temperature of Burkina Faso from 1960 to 2012 was obtained from the National Meteorological Service of Burkina Faso (DGM) and the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute. Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and temperature anomalies methodology have been used to assess anomalies in rainfall and temperature covering a period of 48 years, from 1964 to 2011; and Mann-Kendall test and Theil-Sen slope estimator to assess the significance of the trends and the Theil-Sen slope estimator is used to identify their magnitude. The analysis of farmers’ perceptions of climate change indicates that most farmers perceived a declining trend of precipitation and an increasing trend of temperature in all areas. Results from recorded climate data’s analysis, revealed contrasting evidence, while that farmers’ perception of temperature match with historical data, their perception of rainfall evolution were not always corroboted by scientific evidence.