G23A-1048
Quantifying Variations in Airborne Gravity Data Quality Due to Aircraft Selection with the Gravity for the Re-Definition of the American Vertical Datum Project

Tuesday, 15 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Monica Youngman, NOAA's National Geodetic Survey, Germantown, MD, United States, Sandra A Preaux, Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies Greenbelt, Greenbelt, MD, United States and Theresa Damiani, NOAA- Nat-l Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
Abstract:
The U.S. National Geodetic Survey is collecting airborne gravity with the Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) project to produce a geoid supporting heights accurate to 2 centimeters, where possible, with a modernized U.S. vertical datum in 2022. Targeting 15.6 million square kilometers, the GRAV-D project is unprecedented in its scope of consistently collected airborne gravity data across the entire U.S. and its holdings. Currently over 42% of data collection has been completed by 42 surveys (field campaigns) covering 34 completed blocks (data collection areas). The large amount of data available offers a unique opportunity to evaluate the causes of data quality variation from survey to survey.


Two metrics were chosen to use as a basis for comparing the quality of each survey/block: 1. total crossover error (i.e. difference in gravity recorded at all locations of crossing flight lines) and 2. the statistical difference of the airborne gravity from the EGM2008 global model. We have determined that the aircraft used for surveying contributes significantly to the variation in data quality. This paper will further expand upon that recent work, using statistical analysis to determine the contribution of aircraft selection to data quality taking into account other variables such as differences in survey setup or weather conditions during surveying.