The Effects of Varying Crustal Carbonate Composition on Assimilation and CO2 Degassing at Arc Volcanoes

Abstract:

Magma-crustal carbonate interaction and subsequent decarbonation can provide an additional source of CO₂ release to the exogenic system superimposed on mantle-derived CO₂. Carbonate assimilation at present day volcanoes is often modeled by limestone consumption experiments [1-4]. Eruptive products, however, do not clearly display the characteristic ultracalcic melt compositions produced during limestone-magma interaction [4]. Yet estimated CO₂outflux [5] and composition of volcanics in many volcanic systems may allow ~3-17% limestone- or dolostone-assimilated melt contribution. Crystallization may retain ultracalcic melts in pyroxenite cumulates.

To extend our completed study on limestone assimilation, here we explore the effect of varying composition from calcite to dolomite on chemical and thermal decarbonation efficiency of crustal carbonates. Piston cylinder experiments at 0.5 GPa and 900-1200 °C demonstrate that residual mineralogy during interaction with magma shifts from CaTs cpx and anorthite/scapolite in the presence of calcite to Di cpx and Fo-rich olivine with dolomite. Silica-undersaturated melts double in magnesium content, while maintaining high (>30 wt.%) CaO values. At high-T, partial thermal breakdown of dolomite into periclase and CO₂ is minimal (<5%) suggesting that in the presence of magma, CO₂ is primarily released due to assimilation. Assimilated melts at identical P-T conditions depict similarly high volatile contents (10-20 wt.% by EMPA deficit at 0.5 GPa, 1150 °C with hydrous basalt) with calcite or dolomite. Analysis of the coexisting fluid phase indicates the majority of water is dissolved in the melt, while CO₂ released from the carbonate is preferentially partitioned into the vapor. This suggests that although assimilated melts have a higher CO₂ solubility, most of the CO₂can easily degas from the vapor phase at arc volcanoes, possibly more so at volcanic plumbing systems traversing dolomite [8].

[1]Conte et al 2009 EuJMin (21) 763-782; [2]Iacono-Marziano et al 2008 CMP (155) 719-738; [3]Mollo et al 2010 Lithos (114) 503-514; [4]Carter and Dasgupta 2015 EPSL (427) 202-214; [5]Burton et al 2013 RevMinGeochem (75) 323-254; [6]Balassone et al 2013 Lithos (160-161) 84-97; [7]Di Rocco et al. 2012 JPet (53) 2307-2332; [8]Del Moro et al 2001 JVGR (112) 15-24.