B21A-0411
Diurnal sulfur isotope patterns in a stratified euxinic lake

Tuesday, 15 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
William Gilhooly III1, Josef Peter Werne2, Molly O'Beirne2, James Howard Harris IV1, Fotios Fouskas1, Jeff R Havig3, Trinity L Hamilton4 and Michael McCormick5, (1)Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States, (2)Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, (3)University of Cincinnati Main Campus, Cincinnati, OH, United States, (4)University of Cincinnati Main Campus, Biological Sciences, Cincinnati, OH, United States, (5)Hamilton College, Clinton, United States
Abstract:
The distribution of sulfur isotopes in the environment is controlled by fractionations imparted during microbial sulfate reduction that commonly range between 19‰ and 66‰. In addition, microbial sulfide oxidation and subsequent disproportionation of intermediate phases of sulfur may contribute to the net isotopic offset observed between sulfate and sulfide. Thus, it has been proposed that the cycling of sulfur, comprising repeated cycles of reduction, oxidation, and disproportionation, is responsible for producing offsets up to 65‰ between the δ34S values of sulfate and sulfide. Such large fractionations are often observed in nature though disproportionation is not necessarily required to produce such large offsets. To address these questions, we report on initial results from inorganic sulfur cycling in the water column and pore waters of euxinic Fayetteville Green Lake (FGL), New York. Water column samples were collected during the day when phototrophic sulfide oxidation is likely active and during the night when chemolithotrophy is likely operative. The sulfur isotopic offsets between sulfate and sulfide at the sediment water interface (57‰) are strikingly similar to those reported for the bottom waters of FGL (55‰; Zerkle et al., GCA, 4953-4970, 2010). The offset increases to nearly 70‰ at 25 cm within the sediments, suggesting ongoing microbial sulfur cycling or possibly differential diffusion during sulfate reduction within the sediments. We will compare the day/night isotope patterns with those of the pore waters to focus on the net isotope effects of sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation.