Reconciling biases and uncertainties of AIRS and MODIS ice cloud properties

Abstract:

We will discuss comparisons of collocated Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) ice cloud optical thickness (COT), effective radius (CER), and cloud thermodynamic phase retrievals. The ice cloud comparisons are stratified by retrieval uncertainty estimates, horizontal inhomogeneity at the pixel-scale, vertical cloud structure, and other key parameters. Although an estimated 27% globally of all AIRS pixels contain ice cloud, only 7% of them are spatially uniform ice according to MODIS. We find that the correlations of COT and CER between the two instruments are strong functions of horizontal cloud heterogeneity and vertical cloud structure. The best correlations are found in single-layer, horizontally homogeneous clouds over the low-latitude tropical oceans with biases and scatter that increase with scene complexity. While the COT comparisons are unbiased in homogeneous ice clouds, a bias of 5–10 microns remains in CER within the most homogeneous scenes identified. This behavior is entirely consistent with known sensitivity differences in the visible and infrared bands. We will use AIRS and MODIS ice cloud properties to evaluate ice hydrometeor output from climate model output, such as the CAM5, with comparisons sorted into different dynamical regimes. The results of the regime-dependent comparisons will be described and implications for model evaluation and future satellite observational needs will be discussed.