S24A-01
Seismic monitoring results from the first 6 months of CO2 injection at the Aquistore geological storage site, Saskatchewan, Canada

Tuesday, 15 December 2015: 16:00
305 (Moscone South)
Donald John White1, Anna Stork2, Douglas R Schmitt3, Kyle Worth4, Kyle Harris1, Brian Roberts1, Thomas M Daley5, Claire Samson6 and Michael J- Kendall7, (1)Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, (2)University of Bristol, School of Earth Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom, (3)University of Alberta, Physics, Edmonton, AB, Canada, (4)Petroleum Technology Research Centre, Regina, SK, Canada, (5)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Geophysics, Berkeley, CA, United States, (6)Carleton University, Ottowa, ON, Canada, (7)University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
Abstract:
The Aquistore Project, located in SE Saskatchewan, Canada, is a demonstration project for CO2 storage in a deep saline aquifer. CO2 captured from a nearby coal-fired power plant is being injected into a brine-filled sandstone formation at 3100-3300 m depth. CO2 injection commenced in April, 2015, at initial rates of up to 250 tonnes per day. Seismic monitoring methods have been employed to track the subsurface CO2 plume and to record any injection-induced microseismicity. Active seismic methods utilized include 4D surface seismics using a sparse permanent array, 4D vertical seismic profiles (VSP) with both downhole geophones and a fiber optic distributed acoustic sensor (DAS) system. Pre-injection baseline seismic surveys have established very good repeatability with NRMS values as low as 0.07. 3D finite-difference seismic modelling of fluid flow simulations is used with the repeatability estimates to determine the appropriate timing for the first CO2 monitor surveys. Time-lapse logging is being conducted on a regular basis to provide in situ measurement of the change in seismic velocity associated with changes in CO2 saturation. Continuous passive seismic recording has been ongoing since the summer of 2012 to establish background local seismicity prior to the start of CO2 injection. Passive monitoring is being conducted using two, 2.5 km long, orthogonal linear arrays of surface geophones.with 3-component short-period geophones, 3 broadband surface seismometers, and an array of 3-component short-period geophones in an observation well. No significant injection-related seismicity (Mw > -1) has been detected at the surface during the first 4 months of CO2 injection. On-going analysis of the downhole passive data will provide further information as to the occurrence of lower magnitude microseismicity (Mw of -1 to -3).