Evaluating Reflectance Spectroscopy as a Method of Rapid Cryptotephra Identification using Component Analysis: Tephrochronology of the Lesser Antilles Arc

Abstract:

The reactivation of Montserrat’s South Soufrière-Soufrière Hills volcanic complex has impelled the creation of tephrochronologic records in the Lesser Antilles Arc in order to assess volcanic hazards to human safety. Developing an eruptive history of Montserrat by recording tephra layers preserved in marine sediment is hindered by the lack of a rapid, non-destructive method for detecting cryptotephra, tephra deposits invisible to the naked eye, in marine cores. Identifying cryptotephra is important because some cryptotephra layers represent primary tephra emplacement from small proximal eruptions, events that if excluded from a volcanic record could mischaracterize a volcano’s eruptive frequency over time.

VSWIR [0.4-2.5 μm] reflectance spectroscopy is a candidate for rapid, non-destructive cryptotephra detection in marine sediment cores because it can detect tephra in hemipelagic sediment using summary parameters sensitive to iron content and clay minerals (McCanta et al. 2014, AGU abstract OS53D-1086). Spectra from marine cores U1396C-1H-1A through U1396C-1H-5A, collected during International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) mission 340, reveal 29 potential cryptotephra layers (McCanta et al. 2014, AGU abstract OS53D-1086). This study seeks to determine the effectiveness of reflectance spectroscopy at identifying cryptotephra by measuring the abundance of volcanic materials (i.e., glass shards/vesicular pumice and non-vesicular lava clasts) in these layers ( LeFriant et al. 2008; Cassidy et al. 2014).

Component analysis was conducted on select core intervals with both cryptotephra-identifying peaks in reflectance parameters, and tephra-indicative peaks in core scanning XRF and magnetic susceptibility parameters (McCanta et al. 2014, AGU abstract OS53D-1086). Samples in this subset show abundances of non-vesicular lava and vesicular pumice clasts above expected background abundances, supporting the existence of cryptotephra at these locations (Fig. 1; LeFriant et al. 2008; Cassidy et al. 2014). This suggests that reflectance spectroscopy is an effective means of identifying cryptotephra in situ, and when employed in concert with other core scanning techniques could facilitate widespread rapid identification of cryptotephra in future tephrochronology studies.