PP23D-06
Miocene-Pleistocene Paleoclimate and Paleoenvironment in the Meade Basin, Kansas

Tuesday, 15 December 2015: 14:55
2003 (Moscone West)
Kathryn E Snell1, Kevin T Uno2, Anne C Fetrow3, Crystal Burgess4, William E. Lukens5, David L. Fox6, Kena Fox-Dobbs3 and Pratigya J Polissar7, (1)University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)Lamont -Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY, United States, (3)University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA, United States, (4)Alfred University, Geology and Environmental Science, Alfred, NY, United States, (5)Baylor University, Department of Geology, Waco, TX, United States, (6)University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, United States, (7)Lamont-Doherty Earth Observato, Nyack, NY, United States
Abstract:
The Meade Basin in southwestern Kansas preserves a unique record of paleovegetation and small mammal faunal change from the Miocene to the Pleistocene. Many of the paleosols preserved in this basin contain paleosol carbonate nodules, thick calcretes and abundant organic-rich horizons, which makes it ideally suited for a multiproxy study that explores the role of paleoenvironmental change in driving floral and faunal change. Here we focus on the carbonate samples where we measured carbon and oxygen isotopes (δ13Cc and δ18Oc, respectively); used clumped isotope thermometry (Δ47) to estimate soil temperature and soil water δ18O; and assessed the preservation state and additional paleoenvironmental features of the samples using optical and cathodoluminescence (CL) microscopy.

The carbon isotope record matches previous studies from the region and shows an increase in the relative abundance of C4 biomass on the landscape since the late Miocene. The Δ47 temperatures and the δ18O of soil water, while variable, show no significant change in average values through time. The textural and luminescenece characteristics suggest some samples have undergone moderate to extensive diagenetic alteration from groundwater fluids, perhaps causing some of the variability in the geochemical records. Soil depth may also account for some of the variability. Overall, these data suggest that temperature is unlikely to be the dominant factor driving paleovegetation and faunal change in this region from the Miocene to Pleistocene. In addition, these data highlight the importance of assessing preservation for all carbonate samples, regardless of whether or not the samples have been deeply buried.