MR22A-07
Effects of Composition and Iron Spin State on the Structural Transition of (Mg,Fe)CO3 in the Earth's Lower Mantle

Tuesday, 15 December 2015: 11:50
301 (Moscone South)
Han Hsu and Sheng-Chieh Huang, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Abstract:
Iron-bearing magnesium carbonates (Mg,Fe)CO3 are believed the major carbon carriers in the Earth’s deep lower mantle; they may play a crucial role in the Earth’s deep carbon cycle. Knowledge of the physical and chemical properties of these carbonates is thus essential for our understanding of the mantle’s role in global carbon cycle. Experiments have shown that (Mg,Fe)CO3 ferromagnesite (calcite structure) can be stable up to 80-100 GPa. At 45-50 GPa, ferromangsite undergoes a high-spin to low-spin transition, accompanied by a volume reduction and elastic anomalies. Starting ~100 GPa, ferromagnesite goes through a complicated structural transition. The detail of this transition and the atomic structures of high-pressure (Mg,Fe)CO3 phases are still highly debated. Experimental observations and theoretical results are inconsistent so far. In experiments, several distinct high-pressure (Mg,Fe)CO3 structures have been reported, including a P21/c phase [1] and a Pmm2 phase [2]. In theory, a C2/m phase [3] and a P-1 phase [4] have been suggested, while the Pmm2 phase is not found. One possible reason for such a discrepancy is that all available theoretical calculations so far are based on pure MgCO3, while experimental works are performed using (Mg,Fe)CO3 with high iron concentration ( > 50%). Clearly, the concentration of iron and the possible iron spin crossover can significantly affect the stability of these high-pressure (Mg,Fe)CO3 phases. Here, we use density functional theory + self-consistent Hubbard U (DFT+Usc) calculations to study this structural transition. The effects of composition and iron spin state on these (Mg,Fe)COphases are also discussed. Our results can be expected to provide insightful information for better understanding the Earth’s deep carbon cycle.

[1] E. Boulard et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5184 (2011).

[2] J. Liu et al., Sci. Rep. 5, 7640 (2015).

[3] A. R. Oganov et al., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 273, 38 (2008).

[4] C. J. Pickard and R. J. Needs, Phys. Rev. B 91, 104101 (2015).