EP41B-0924
Migration Reversals in Grain-size Transitions to Shoreline

Thursday, 17 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Carolina Baumanis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States and Wonsuck Kim, University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States
Abstract:
The migration of the lithofacies boundary recorded in the sedimentary record is key to interpreting changes in depositional environments. Change in grain size in the stratigraphic record is one of the most recognizable physical lithological features. Advance and retreat of the lithofacies boundary (gravel-sand transition) is attributed to external control variation, e.g., climate variation, sea-level change, and tectonic subsidence. While most models focus on predicting the response of the fluviodeltaic shoreline to these forcings, none have thoroughly incorporated the migration of grain-size transitions (GST) that coevolve within the fluviodeltaic system. We present a delta evolution model that treats the shoreline and GST as moving boundaries to provide quantitative understanding of the dynamic interaction between the external boundary (shoreline) and the internal lithofacies boundaries (GSTs) under relative sea-level rise. We tested a range of relative sea-level rise rates in the model. The shoreline and GST gradually reduced their progradation rates and eventually retreated landward as the fluviodeltaic topset and foreset elongated. However, their timings of retreats were different, resulting in a counterintuitive case for a quicker retreat of GST while the shoreline still continued to advance. A series of scaled flume experiments with a sand and crushed walnut sediment mixture captured the same behaviors of these two moving boundaries. We found that GST experienced higher relative sea-level rise rates that scale with the downstream river slope and the shoreline progradation rate, which caused earlier GST retreat timing in comparison to the shoreline. Time series data from the experiments show higher natural variability in migration rate of GST compared to that of the shoreline. Therefore, final recorded stratigraphy displayed a GST trajectory as a shazam line that shows zigzag fluctuations. This study investigates autogenic processes acting on the fluviodeltaic surface and tests their stratigraphic architecture recorded in the trajectories. The fundamental understanding of migration of both the lithofacies transition and shoreline in fluviodeltaic systems from this study will aid in accurately assessing the trajectories of GST in sedimentary strata as a proxy for environmental change.