C13E-07
Observed Spatial and Temporal Variability of Subglacial Discharge-Driven Plumes in Greenland’s Outlet Glacial Fjords
Monday, 14 December 2015: 15:10
3009 (Moscone West)
Dave Sutherland1, Dustin Carroll1, Jonathan D Nash2, Emily Shroyer2, John Mickett3, Leigh A Stearns4, Mason Fried5, Timothy Bartholomaus5 and Ginny A Catania6, (1)University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States, (2)Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR, United States, (3)University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States, (4)University of Kansas, Department of Geology, Lawrence, KS, United States, (5)University of Texas, Institute for Geophysics, Austin, TX, United States, (6)University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
Abstract:
Hydrographic and velocity observations in Greenland’s outlet glacier fjords have revealed, unsurprisingly, a rich set of dynamics over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Through teasing apart the distinct processes that control circulation within these fjords, we are likely to better understand the impact of fjord circulation on modulating outlet glacier dynamics, and thus, changes in Greenland Ice Sheet mass balance. Here, we report on data from the summers of 2013-2015 in two neighboring fjords in the Uummannaq Bay region of west Greenland: Kangerlussuup Sermia (KS) and Rink Isbræ (RI). We find strong subglacial discharge driven plumes in both systems that evolve on synoptic and seasonal time scales, without the complicating presence of other circulation processes. The plumes both modify fjord water properties and respond to differences in ambient water properties, supporting the notion that a feedback exists between subglacial discharge plume circulation and water mass properties. This feedback between subglacial discharge and water properties potentially influences submarine melt rates at the glacier termini. Observed plume properties, including the vertical structure of velocity, and temperature and salinity anomalies, are compared favorably to model estimates. In KS, we find a near-surface intensified plume with high sediment content that slows and widens as it evolves downstream. In contrast, the plume in RI is entirely subsurface, ranging from 100-300 m depth at its core during summer, although it shows similar temperature, salinity, and optical backscatter signals to the KS plume. Importantly, the distinct vertical plume structures imprint on the overall water mass properties found in each fjord, raising the minimum temperatures by up to 1-2°C in the case of RI.