V51A-3030
A 74 or 75 ka Age for the Toba Super-eruption? Resolving the Debate.

Friday, 18 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Michael Storey, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, Richard G Roberts, University of Wollongong, Centre for Archaeological Science, School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Wollongong, Australia and Michael Haslam, University of Oxford, RLAHA, School of Archaeology, Oxford, United Kingdom
Abstract:
The Toba super-eruption in Sumatra, ~74,000 years ago, was the largest terrestrial volcanic event of the Quaternary. Some have proposed that the eruption produced widespread perturbations of climate and ecosystems. Evaluation of the environmental impact of the eruption and linkage to rapid climate oscillations recorded in ice core, sediment and speleothem records requires an accurate and precise age for the event, with uncertainties at the centurial level. Two recent studies, however, have proposed quite different 40Ar/39Ar ages for this volcanic event of 73.88 ± 0.32 ka (Storey et al., 2012) and 75.0 ± 0.9 ka (Mark et al, 2014), with both uncertainties expressed at 1σ, leading to radically different interpretations of its global impact.

40Ar/39Ar is a relative dating method, in which the unknown is run against a mineral standard of known age. Storey et al (2012) obtained their age estimate using a new-generation, multi-collector noble gas mass spectrometer (NU Instruments Noblesse) equipped with ion-counters, while Mark et al. (2014) used an earlier generation of lower resolution, single-collector mass spectrometer (MAP 215-50). Both studies used the same mineral standard (Alder Creek sanidine, ACs), except that Mark et al. (2014) used an older value, which accounts for the discrepancy in ages between the two studies. The value used by Mark et al. for ACs is geologically implausible, because it results in older 40Ar/39Ar dates than the youngest co-existing zircon U/Pb CATIMS ages (e.g., Rivera et al., 2013, 2014). Use of the same value for ACs as used by Storey et al. (2012) results in an identical, but less precise, astronomically calibrated age of 73.9 ± 0.9 ka for the Mark et al. data.

Here, we review combined U/Pb and 40Ar/39Ar age data (both published and unpublished) for a number of Quaternary and older volcanic ash deposits, and U/Th ages for late Quaternary speleothems. These data strongly support the age assigned to ACs by Storey et al. (2012) and Rivera et al. (2013) and, hence, an astronomically calibrated age of 73.9 ka age for the Toba super-eruption. This confirms the original high-precision 40Ar/39Ar age determination of Storey et al. (2012)

Storey et al., 2012, PNAS, 109, 18684-18688; Rivera et al., 2013, Chem. Geol., 345, 87-98; Rivera et al., 2014, Geol. 42 643-646; Mark et al, 2014, Quat. Geochron. 21, 90-103