H31E-1460
A County Level Assessment of Water Withdrawals for Hydraulic Fracturing: Where are Impacts Most Likely?

Wednesday, 16 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Stephen D LeDuc, Environmental Protection Agency Arlington, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Arlington, VA, United States, Megan M Fleming, Environmental Protection Agency Washington DC, Office of Science Policy, Washington, DC, United States, Chris Clark, Environmental Protection Agency Arlington, Arlington, VA, United States and Jason Todd, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC, United States
Abstract:
Concerns have arisen of the potential effects of hydraulic fracturing water withdrawals on both water for human consumption and aquatic communities. Any impacts are likely to be location specific since current U.S. hydraulic fracturing activities are concentrated in particular regions, water availability is unevenly distributed, and hydraulic fracturing water use differs between locations, including the amount of water use per well, source water, and reuse rates. Here, we used FracFocus to estimate annual hydraulic fracturing water use, and combined this with U.S. Geological Survey water use data and water availability indices to identify U.S. counties where potential impacts may be most likely. We surveyed the literature to understand source water and reuse rates. Overall, we found that hydraulic fracturing water use and consumption are a small percentage relative to total water use and consumption for most U.S. counties. However, there are 26 counties where fracturing water use is greater than 10% compared to 2010 total water use, and eight and four counties at greater than 30% and 50%, respectively. We conclude hydraulic fracturing water use currently has the greatest potential for impacts in southern and western Texas due to relatively high fracturing water use, low reuse rates, low fresh water availability, and frequent drought. However, the availability of brackish groundwater in these areas is also high relative to fracturing water use, suggesting an alternative source that could reduce potential impacts. Comparatively, the potential for impacts appears to be lower in other U.S. regions. While our county-scale findings do not preclude the possibility of more localized water quantity effects, this study provides a relative indicator of areas where potential problems might arise. Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.