Geomagnetic Intensity Record from the 1.43 Ga Laramie Anorthosite Complex

Abstract:

Models of core and mantle evolution with a basal magma ocean suggest that vigorous convection in the outer core may have begun in the Proterozoic, but that inner core crystallization did not drive the geodynamo until ~0.5 Ga. Published paleointensity data suggest that Earth’s magnetic field may have been relatively weak during the Proterozoic due to geodynamo activity generated by superadiabatic cooling of the fluid core. The Laramie Anorthosite Complex (LAC; Wyoming, USA) crystallized at 1.43 Ga, during the hypothesized Proterozoic weak-field interval. The LAC consists of several genetically related plutons, including (from oldest to youngest) the Poe Mountain and Snow Creek Anorthosites, and the Sybille Monzosyenite. Anorthositic, leucogabbroic, and monzosyenitic rocks from these units formed under a range of fO₂ and contain different magnetic carriers, but likely retain a thermoremanent magnetization from at or close to their crystallization age.

Initial IZZI Thellier experiments were conducted on oriented cores from 22 sites. Additional paleointensity analyses utilized smaller chips, selected for high Königsberger ratios to minimize the influence of larger discrete magnetic grains. Over 60% of these high Q specimens yielded reliable results, using strict criteria (FRAC > 0.80; beta < 0.1) in the ThellierGUI program. Ten site mean paleofield estimates from the Poe Mountain Anorthosite range from 40 to 70 μT (7.8 - 13.7 x 10²² Am²) while the Snow Creek Anorthosite has lower values (~20 μT). These values have been corrected for remanence anisotropy, which is significant for core samples (median τ1/τ3 = 1.46) and extreme for some chips (τ1 values exceeding 0.95) from the Snow Creek Anorthosite. A proposed slow cooling rate of the LAC would cause our paleointensity values to overestimate the ancient field by as much as 50%. Nonetheless, the range of intensity values recorded in the LAC is similar to that in the Phanerozoic and does not appear compatible with the proposed weak Proterozoic field.